• 2 Posts
  • 575 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 9th, 2023

help-circle


  • I think fertilizer production is one of those things where we already have a solution that works on renewable energy, but it’s more expensive than the conventional methods.

    It basically boils down (pun intended) to pressure cooking organic materials. This requires a lot of energy. In my opinion it would make sense to decentralize the production and make it smaller and closer to the also decentralized sources of renewable energy.

    About 50% of the price of conventional fertilizer comes from the transportation anyway, so it would make a lot of sense to make it closer to where it’s needed. This is not economically feasible with the conventional production though.






  • The first ten times I read a headline like this, I thought it was just Americans being American, but then it started happening elsewhere too.

    I do believe it has to do with the development of suburbs, which has to do with prioritizing car infrastructure over anything else.

    I live in a small town, less than 20k people, and even here, the developers of the most recent suburbs have chosen not to have pedestrian sidewalks at all. They’d rather sell those square meters as building lots. It makes sense. Nobody is requesting a sidewalk to upkeep just so they can walk to their neighbor who they don’t socialize with anyway. The kids from these places never even get to learn how to walk a street safely, because their parents insist on driving them everywhere for their safety.

    The older suburbs were made in a different time when politicians had expectations of cities growing and developing over time to have their own centres and shops and what not, which would require facilitating traffic passing through and local accessibility. The modern ones do not. They know now that modern suburbs are dead end appendix streets that never develop because people drive to the strip malls instead of walking to a local store, so there’s no reason for the municipality to require silly things like pavements, bike paths and playgrounds and such.

    I do notice that more young people are currently choosing not to buy houses in those areas, but it is going to be difficult to fix the layout once it has already been made, because there really isn’t room for improvement between the lots.












  • This right here:

    The effectiveness of boycotts relies on a mass demonstration of refusal, and that massive movement doesn’t currently exist."

    This is the problem.

    If one dumb ass CEO decides to destroy the environment, it requires millions of people to know about it and act upon it, just to make a dent in the quarterly income statement that might make the one CEO consider other options.

    We don’t actually have a choice as consumers.

    We can vote for more regulation of companies, but politics only work locally, while pollution works globally. We’ll basically need a world wide political concesus just to stop one single idiot from destroying the globe.

    The guillotine might be a brutal and unpleasant vigilant idea, but it sure as hell is faster, cheaper and causes fewer casualties than any other way.