• Jaysyn
      link
      fedilink
      -19
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The USA could end homelessness or hunger (and maybe both) nationally for the amount of money we sent to Israel each year.

      • @Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        381 year ago

        No, no they could not lol. Not even remotely close.

        The US spends $2 Billion a year on aid to Israel.

        They spend $105 Billion a year in direct payments to SNAP (food stamps) recipients.

        And $32 Billion a year on section 8 housing vouchers.

          • @treefrog@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            14
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The problem is starving homeless children. Feeding them and giving them housing fixes this. It also gives them more opportunities, which makes it more likely they contribute to society in meaningful ways (including paying more in taxes than we spend helping them, especially when factored over generations). The alternative is often a bigger tax burden via the criminal justice system. (Prison is much more expensive than housing vouchers and food stamps).

            Bringing people out of poverty is a good economic investment. The only time handouts don’t help is when they go to the financial sector. It doesn’t improve tax income for the State and investors begin to predict bailouts, making risky investments more worthwhile because Uncle Sam will help them out.

            Tax the rich, feed the poor.

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          Since ‘48, we’ve sent over 158 billion in aid- without adjusting for inflation.

          It’s more than all other countries combined- including Ukraine.

          Even that 2 billion could go a very long way to helping.

          • @yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            61 year ago

            You’re right, it could.

            In fact, the US could fund a few wars and conflicts, end homelessness, implement socialized healthcare and fund the world’s best public transit system with affordable high-speed trains between cities simultaneously.

            But they don’t because they don’t want to, not because they can’t.

          • @treefrog@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            That’s enough to end homelessness last I checked. (Last year or so I compared median national housing prices and found that Elon Musk’s wealth was enough to take every family and single person in the country off the street. That’s how obscene 150 billion is. It’s enough to end homelessness).

            • FuglyDuck
              link
              fedilink
              English
              01 year ago

              Eh, I’m a bit pessimistic about a 100% solution to it. Can’t save everyone… That’s not a reason to not do everything that can be done, but I just don’t think there will ever be an end.

              And I absolutely agree with how obscene it is

      • torpak
        link
        fedilink
        91 year ago

        That homelessness and hunger are not ended in the USA is not because the money needed is spent on other things, it is because the government doesn’t want to end them.