The increasing popularity of ultra-heavy SUVs in England means a conventional-engined car bought in 2013 will, on average, have lower carbon emissions than one bought new today, new research has found.

The study by the climate campaign group Possible said there was a strong correlation between income and owning a large SUV, which meant there was a sound argument for “polluter pays” taxes for vehicle emissions based on size.

  • @Pasta4u@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 year ago

    What do u think a electric car eith its huge batteries would do ?

    Telsa model 3 is 3000 pounds

    Chevy equinox is 3300

    Chevy traverse is 4300

    Tesla model Y 4400

    Tesla model x 5200

    Chevy suburban is 5700

    • @Vegoon@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      And the Rivian R1T is 6949 pounds.

      But there is the dacia spring with 2304 pound.

      EV does not automatically have to result in huge heavy cars.

      • @Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        Top speed of 125kph, 0-100kph in 19 seconds… Sure, city cars don’t need to be as heavy but then why need a car at all?

        • @Vegoon@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          “Everyone in the city needs their own car” was not the argument I made, just as your comment did not mean to say that everyone who does not live in the city needs a 3.5 ton truck.

          • @Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11 year ago

            They don’t, but an EV that’s usable in the highway weights as much as a truck. If you want to compare the Spring to other types of vehicles you need to compare its weight to cars in the same category and then you realise that it’s heavier than the equivalent gas car…

            • @Vegoon@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              I have seen Spring and Renault Zoe on highways, in Germany none the less. If your argument is you need big fast cars for highways I don’t see it that way.

              • @Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Sure, I’ve seen a 2CV on the highway, it’s not what it’s meant for and it’s not safe for the person driving it. The Spring at 110kph has a range of 145km in good weather…

                And again, you’re not comparing the car to an equivalent gas model, you’re just trying to prove that EV cars can be light by using the smallest model you can find and in this case, as I already mentioned, the equivalent gas car is still lighter so the EV still wear the roads more than the gas equivalent, which was the original point.

                  • @Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    1
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Then I don’t know why you felt the need to add your opinion to the discussion because if the gas equivalent is absurd then so is the EV version.

    • @MDZA@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      It’s a good point about the weight of EVs. I suppose it’s a question of whether the benefit of EVs are worth the extra wear on the roads.

      When comparing ICE cars though, it’s a pretty clear cut argument that SUVs are worse for everyone except the occupants.

      • @Pasta4u@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        Suv’s are not always worse.

        Equinox 26/31 Corvette is 16/25.

        Equinox can fit five adults plus room for luggage or other items in jt.

        He’ll the Chevy malibu is 27/35 amd is a Sedan. I rather the equinox