• @Saff@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    262 years ago

    How is this news? Yes, you need more energy to move a larger heavier object…Granted, the older engines might not be the most efficient but they weren’t that bad that you can compensate a weight increase of this magnitude!

    • @silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      Individually, sure, but there are a lot more SUVs. Enough that they account for more total emissions.

    • @silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      202 years ago

      Yeah, old pickups were gas guzzlers. But pickups as ordinary commuter cars are incredibly rare in the UK.

      It’s a major problem that they’re mostly sold for that purpose in the US.

      • Nougat
        link
        fedilink
        182 years ago

        “Light trucks” (in the US, at least) don’t have to meet the same fuel economy standards as passenger automobiles, the latter of which includes SUVs. So you build a massive luxury crew cab with a tiny, essentially useless bed, and you can emit more pollution than if it had a permanent “cover” and connected the passenger cabin with the cargo area.

      • @The_v@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        Old pickup trucks?

        My first pickup - 1985 Nissan pickup (manual) averaged 25mpg.

        My current 2022 Chevy 1500 company owned work truck gets 19mpg.

        Of course the old Nissan weighed 2500 lbs. My Chevy work truck weighs in at 4400lbs.

        So fuel efficiency per weight has increased, but the newer trucks larger size still sucks gas.

        I still prefer the smaller trucks, so much easier to drive.