deleted by creator

well why do you think they want you to work from home?

oh just like how everyone got to test out their new weapons in the Spanish civil war

maybe figuring out how to enjoy whatever is going on is more important than speeding through it to the next thing and the next and the next

they were complaining about things that are only unpleasant because of their own feelings toward the situation

did you just not read the last paragraph??

oh so you’re just an unhappy person

oh no!! good thing that doesn’t impact anything

huh?

“they” uses the same number of characters as “s/he” and flows more naturally

try a factor of 100

I was referring to the fair in your hypothetical smartass

as if random civilians with guns wouldn’t bumble around more and also shoot the crowd?

metal detectors? pretty easy since it’s a ticketed event

how is a concern about upending precedent a nonsensical statement? the source of an argument does not impact its validity as a point

but it functions as a whataboutism. it doesn’t address the original concerns of the statement. instead it uses an ad hominem attach to discredit the argument

but it functions as a whataboutism. it doesn’t address the original concerns of the statement. instead it uses an ad hominem attach to discredit the argument

not saying you’re wrong, but that is a whataboutism

I meant that both only exist due to the labor of individuals. without the workforce, billionaires and corporations would not exist