Snap and AI in one post. Is this ragebait?

Oh, what happened? Did someone attached themself a set of bumber nuts?

I am not a big fan of coding agents. I have no troubles with Claude and jetbrains for what I personally do. But I use it for docs, minor fixes and test cases.

Primagen is one of those neovim nerds, not sure if he published its setup anywe6

I use jetbrains IDE since years, and I did some really strange stuff with them.

I used clion with experimental GCC builds and crashed the IDE multiple times. Opened a bug. Got fixed.

We found a bug in their Datagrip Sybase DWH integration. I met some of their team at a conference a week later, talked with them about the bug in person, got fixed during the day.

Sure, bugs may take a while, but thei get fixed.

And to AI. Cursor should be able to connect to jetbrains IDEs from the outside.

There is no other, universal, IDE stack that can come close. Ok, maybe if you are willed to invest weeks in an emcas or neovim setup

As a german, I have my reservations regarding the death penalty.

On the other side, the last death penalties where used against the nazis. So, I am fine if we make an exception here.

What a shit hole.

Maybe, just maybe, and nearly unmoderated repository where everybody can create packages, is not so secure after all? /s

And AUR is the reason I keep arch miles away from any of my systems.

I was worth every penny I earned 4 years ago. 1 year ago, I had to open documentation for C++ features I use for a decade. I could not remember how it works.

Your brain is a muscle, and sure, I had more time to teach, but I got worse at teaching because I got worse at doing

Nothing. I threw them all out. After is forgot how to write good code and how to design good software.

That his how cerebral atrophy must feel like.

No, they won’t, but they may shoot you.

But their models can not be used as flexible as an LLM, they are purpose made

They have, but no LLM as far as I am aware of.

Oh, someone said something against Firefox.

As someone who donated regularly to the Mozilla foundation: adding AI in a browser is a stupid idea, always will be and alone the fact that Firefox spends time and resources in this feature means, they have to earn that money again.

I will not donate anymore, as long as they develop WI features for Firefox.

Vote this and this comment down as much as you like but fact is, that money must come from somewhere, and the biggest source of income is still selling Google the default search engine spot and outer questionable sources.

This is not sustainable and a bad day for user choice.

The KDE PIM Stack is what I use for it.

It does not depend on KDE/Plasma/KWin DM, and should offer what you are looking for

Safe you all the click. Author claims ai is getting better at writing code and we should think about what we want not how we want it.

Friendly reminder LLMs are not good a writing software. They can only put pieces together that may make sense.

Want proof? Ask it to write some valid C++26 without raw pointers, using modules and reflection.

Other stuffis not part of OpenRGB and never will be. Maybe you should have a loook at the project yourself, mainly read the contribution document.

What is your issue? Avoiding fragmentation? Yeah me to.

Currently,I do want to control my mouse, I need a different software that collides work OpenRGB.

This is not fixable by trying to force stuff into OpenRGB the maintainer clearly does not want (he said so).

After we have a working lib, with at least feature parity, I will try to convince the current maintainer of OpenRGB to outsource the device handling, and focus on the features he wants to build.

EDIT and I don’t want to compete with OpenRGB, I want to focus the currently fragmented world of Linux peripheral development in a singular place, so every tool can use it. Ad a library, not a GUI application that just is another project that will die because it gets unmaintanable.

So, please, have a good look at the contribution documentation and the bug tracker. Look for yourself, or try to introduce macro support or other stuff into this project. I have done so in the past.

And to be clear: If the author and maintainer says he don’t want to have this feature, I completely understand.

This will not be a fork of OpenRGB. While I plan to take a huge chunk of it (the reversed generiert device protocols) the library itself, is all written from scratch.

And, as mentioned, OpenRGB has issues. Besides the listed, technical, issues it has also design and maintenance issues:

While OpenRGB heavily depends on Qt, and is written in C++, ur is full of plain C constructs. This is intentional, have a look at the README.md. raw pointer juggling, lifetime issues (therefore, segfaults) and most importantly:

Making it a dependency would not aolfe any of the feature issues. A device, provided by OpenRGB, still has no support for macros, OpenRGB does all the device communication, so no way to add it.

First of all, this would be illegal in many countries.

Second of all: we can differentiate cars by: has red lights, back.

If we lose this option we can no longer differentiate easily if there is a car coming towards us or driving away from us.

So, is that an American “,” or a sane people “,”?

So, either 7k days or 7 1/3 days?

I need to know! Help!

Mhm, would be an interesting scientific experiment

In all seriousness: I am fighting against neonazis here in Germany since >20 years. Physically and rhetorically.

Do not, I repeat do not set teslas on fire!

• you bring people in danger that are innocent
• you will make enemies in crucial places: firefighter, medical services ( i would say police, but you are in the US… so …)
• you will hurt the environment

But new point could be a good idea. I mean, those big canvases scream for some spray paint.

BMW i5 driver here, no Phantom braking in 30000km Autobahn