1·
3 months agoThe principle of minimizing surprise – of predicting the next thing – is what most people who study this sort of thing have used as the basis for most of our cognitive capacity.
Cool unscientific story.
- 345 Posts
- 2.7K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: February 19th, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
The discussion is about cognition
Ah yes the foundation of “AI” research - retreating from obvious meanings to redefining words in order to make absurd claims.
We have many very plausible, evidence-driven models
“Plausible” counts for jack shit in science.
There are many models because there’s no convincing evidence for any of them.
the problem is figuring out which have the best predictive power. And that problem is being very actively worked.
Yes, these models have no experimental or “predictive” use even after decades of “research”.
we have no idea how LLMs work
Give me a break. LLMs are completely 100% understood. People developed weighted functions using very very basic statistics. There is absolutely no mystery here.
WOOOOSH
4·3 months agoYes, there is a YouTube addon for Kodi. I came here to recommend.
It’s not perfect for sure. There are some things that are annoying or difficult. I get the feeling that the developer is constantly playing cat and mouse with YouTube. But overall it blocks ads and plays my videos so I use it every day. I’m watching right now…
You can tell it’s an econ study when the premise is pointless, the experiment is pseudo-science, and the results are worthless.
12·3 months agoThis user (Twongo) has been posting on Lemmy for decares?
lowest-carbon
Ok, now do nuclear waste.
1·3 months agoImagine standing in the middle and somehow not being a clown.
Has it passed the Turing Test?
(JK. The tests are bullshit too.)
You? TBH I wouldn’t do this because I don’t really care.
Capitalism is evil and tracking some shipment for the benefit of some empire won’t change that at all.
It’s a more efficient, direct, and profitable method for destroying the planet.
See also almost all “technology” under capitalism.
Global Capitalism > Discrete Imperialism
it’s less of an echo chamber
Just different echoes.
Yes, go forward to Mastodon.
twitter is far more integrated and popular with fash.
Improved that.
It’s a word that’s completely understandable by any reasonable native english speaker.
The burden of proof is very much on the people who say a computer is a person (and get paid for it).