Checkmate, consumer.

I expect nothing less from someone whose profile picture is an anime child smelling feet.

Check out gear by GL.iNet. They’re pretty cheap, albeit low specced, but they come with OpenWRT flavor preinstalled. They’re an unbelievable value proposition and I’ve been running mine with no noticeable issues since September. For you I would look at something like their GL-AX1800. Poke around on their store, but that AX1800 is just shy of $100 in the US.

I got mine specifically because of my home lab set up and them being recommended by my work’s cybersec manager.

We have also seen the budget range improve in quality and affordability. There will always be cheap junk TVs and overly expensive TVs, but that midrange, where most people buy, has become rock solid. There just isn’t much region to upgrade at the moment.

I was just in Hawaii a few weeks ago. Both touristy and non-touristy areas. I can concur, would be a weird ass vibe if I saw someone open carry

Pretty sure. He’s been rocking the longer hair for a little while now.

That explains it. No one does this out of the goodness of their hearts. It’s either a tax write off or avoiding CoL adjustments.

Yeah, it’s not like anyone bought a Disney + sub because it was available in the Tesla lol

I think they’re looking for more a consumer perspective. Disney will probably sue for a breach of contract, but I also wouldn’t be surprised if they somehow ended up signing a TOS that allows Tesla to make changes whenever they want. From a consumer perspective, definitely legal to just remove an app. False advertising? Nah, when you buy the car/use the infotainment center, you’re agreeing to a TOS that requires you give your first born to the gigafactory they built.

Seriously though, it’s very standard practice that a TOS includes language that the service can change in quality at any given time with no warning.

Google will expand billing options for in-app purchases and simplify direct app downloads from developers.

Sounds like a win actually. Nice.

Oof.

Exactly. I hate when people lead off with that. It assumes their personal involvement in the war does anything other than make themselves feel less hopeless.

According to his biographer, he’s wildly bipolar.

deleted by creator

Maybe this?

Every instance of every such component was already running in a separate thread, but now they can actually run in parallel.

deleted by creator

💀

Incredible photo.

Exactly. Instagram doesn’t claim ownership to any of your content, but Instagram’s terms of use state that the user grants Instagram a non-exclusive, fully paid, and royalty-free, transferable, sub-licensable, worldwide license to use their content. Additionally, they can make money off your content without ever paying you a cut. Honestly, it’s pretty boiler plate at this point. No one should expect anything else from corporations.

Or the oil industry hiring economists to refute other economists conclusions when it comes to damages from oil spills (see Exxon Valdez)