We found the thin skinned tankie.

All your water are dirted to us.

deleted by creator

just ‘dirting the waters’, as peeps say

Nice try, but no.

IDK. I’m just some guy, eh?

Verified Canadian

Yao Ming?

Ah yes the generation that wasn’t even worth naming so they gave us a placeholder.

Growing up Gen X in the US was watching a slow motion train wreck where you’re able to see the causes, current wreck, and even look down the road to the future repercussions but everything you do or try to make things better for everyone is ignored, co-opted, or sidelined by the monolithic boomer voting bloc. And all the while you’re being gaslit by the beneficiaries of the current shitshow selling you an American Dream that never was true and hasn’t been remotely attainable since you joined the workforce.

You could do better (worse)

Granite that I agree with the sediment.

Yesh, and knock ot off with the avacado toast! Amiright?

The thing is, I agree with you about the suffering of animals.

You’re just a sanctimonious self important prick trying to flaunt your imagined moral superiority as some kind of bullshit purity test as to whether people care about animals.

Have fun with that, don’t stop to wonder why people walk away.

Oh, it’s not that at all. You just come off as very holier than thou the way you shove into and escalate the discussion without regard for others, but great job capturing some attention.

It is 100% you bringing your own agenda without regard or consideration for the discussion at hand. You’re not trying to add to the discussion by jumping in and championing your cause without reading the room.

Or maybe don’t try to shoe horn the issue in as a non-sequitor and take umbrage when called out?

You forgot groceries, mandatory insurance, and utilities…

Good bot

Still around, too: https://www.gtec.at/product-configurator/unicorn-brain-interface/

$1,200 US entry price might seem a bit steep for a “fancy game controller/keyboard” to the able-bodied, but the QOL improvements for disabled people easily eclipse that.

They isolate the chemicals they want to test for smell through extraction/synthesis/purification and then have a professional smeller identify what scents that particular chemical matches.

They can also compare the isolated chemicals to known scents containing the same chemicals.

The pads from the teenagers’ armpits had two steroids present – 5alphaandrost-16-en-3-one and 5alphaandrost-16-en-3alpha-ol – which smell of sweat, urine, musk and sandalwood. They also had higher levels of six carboxylic acids, which give off unattractive smells including cheese, goat and wax.

What this means is that two steroids (5alphaandrost-…) found in teens’ armpits are also found in sweat, urine, musk, and sandalwood. The 6 carbolic acids are also found in cheese, goats, and wax.

So to answer your question: not subjective. This is objective, reproducible evidence.

We have catalogued many chemicals and what they smell or taste like. You can thank the perfume industry for a good portion of the smell based science. A lot of flavor based research exists, as well. Unfortunately some of that research was done for sick purposes like finding out how to engender craving or how to make the body ignore chemical signals that it is full and it is time to stop earing. But I digress.

This just in: making the world a better place for a few at the expense of the many does not inspire people to want to bring new people into the world.