snooggums

I’m assuming Allie is from accounting.

Asbestos

(25 years from now as per the article)

Anything 20 years or more away is a pipe dream that isn’t likely to happen anywhere close to speculation.

Left out of the meme, not left out of being called to fix shit.

We truly are the middle child of generations, forgotten until we are needed.

It is completely useless as presented by the major players who atrocities trying to jam models that are trying to everything at the same time and that is what we always talk about when discussing AI.

We aren’t talking about focused implementations that are Wikipedia to a certain set of data or designed for specific purposes. That is why we don’t need nuance, although the reminder that we aren’t talking about smaller scale AI used by humans as tools is nice once in a while.

Check out those paws!

close up of feet

A lot of people are fine with getting wrong answers about shit they don’t know already. That’s what gets spread in social media and what was used for a large portion of the training data and what is available when AI does a web search.

It presents something that looks right, that is what most people care about.

Lifted trucks have to have extensions to lower the balls so they hang the right height for trailers.

Apparently a couple of them fell in love.

If I remember correctly the Intel floating point thing didn’t come up as a negative for most users like AI does.

the university or the government does not project these things and adjust the available program sizes

They kinda do, but only the part where they increase program sizes after demand exists and only wind down when the market is saturated. They can’t really work too far ahead if they don’t know ow something will be in demand and they don’t want to tell students to not do something they offer just because there are too many graduates. Add the four or five years to graduation and you get a system that lags behind reality even if the planning was better.

But a well designed post secondary education means graduates can go into similar or related fields, they aren’t limited to what is on their diploma except in their own minds.

“Durian fruit because they have replicators that can make anything.”

Personally I think that claim is a decent one: user-initiated request should not be subject to robot limitations, and are not the source of DDOS attack to web sites.

They are one of the sources!

The AI scraping when a user enters a prompt is DDOSing sites in addition to the scraping for training data that is DDOSing sites. These shitty companies are repeatedly slamming the same sites over and over again in the least efficient way because they are not using the scraped data from training when they process a user prompt that does a web search.

Scraping once extensively and scraping a bit less but far more frequently have similar impacts.

IT’S LOUD IN DA CLUB

They do it this way in case the data changed, similar to how a person would be viewing the current site. The training was for the basic understanding, the real time scraping is to account for changes.

It is also horribly inefficient and works like a small scale DDOS attack.

The AI doesn’t just do a web search and display a page, in grabs the search results and scrapes multiple pages far faster than a person could.

It doesn’t matter whether a human initiated it when the load on the website is far, far higher and more intrusive in a shorter period of time with AI compared to a human doing a web search and reading the cobtent themselves.

A user cannot physically generate as much traffic as a bot.

You are so close to getting it!

There is no difference between emptying a glass of water and draining swimming pool either if you ignore the total volume of water.

On the flip side, most websites are so ad-ridden these days a reader mode or other summary tool is almost required for normal browsing.

Firefox with uBlock Origin works perfectly fine and pages load faster without the ads!

But a user initiated operation isn’t the same as a bot.

Oh fuck off with that AI company propaganda.

The AI companies already overwhelmed sites to get training data and are repeating their shitty scraping practices when users interact with their AI. It’s the same fucking thing.

Web crawlers for search engines don’t scrape pages every time a user searches like AI does. Both web crawlers and scrapers are bots, and how a human initiates their operation, scheduled or not, doesn’t matter as much as the fact that they do things very differently and only one of the two respects robots.txt.

Or find a more efficient way to manage data, since their current approach is basically DDOSing the internet for training data and also for responding to user interactions.