

You continue with the insult responses because you don’t have a point.


You continue with the insult responses because you don’t have a point.


My posts are almost always based on logic. I do not engage in insult posts, like you did.


Your intolerant ad-hominem post offers no constructive rebuttal of a good-faith argument and should be deleted by the mods.


Imagine a circumstance in which you have to use your real ID to sign up for a social media site
You’re setting up a false premise. It doesn’t have to be done that way.


Is removing digital privacy really something we want to be flirting with?
Digital privacy and anonymous posting are two different things.


Women simply prefer spaces where they can control the membership and replies to ensure validation of their beliefs. You’d be surprised by how censorious women spaces can be. Posting replies on their spaces is never egalitarian. And women have no problem brigading either.


The 2:1 ratio of course just degrades the platform
Men and women have different interest. It’s mostly a fantasy to expect 50/50 participation.


They don’t want experienced, knowledgable, self-confident partners. They want naive young women
You’ve obviously never lived with the aftermath of dating worn out, bitter and combative women who have been traumatized by their numerous “experiences.” Men like inexperienced women precisely because they want to mold her and give her her first experiences. Also, “experienced” women are more likely to be single moms.
I love watching credible conspiracy theories turn into pure garbage conspiracy theories right before my eyes in one thread.