100% agree but curious on your speculation as to why.

What’s your policy solution or position?

Simple, it’s not really about the kids, it’s about control of the internet.

I think they knew and it didn’t matter to them which is oddly prophetic when I look at the state of the world today lol

People panned the game but this was the whole point of the NG Resonance character in Deus Ex Invisible War. People would basically tell this AI pop star intimate details about their lives and then the data was used against them and their local communities.

Corpse Conglomeration is a badass band name though

Many groups have wanted an “online passport” for a long time now and it’s hard for me to not see this as another attempt veiled by “won’t someone think of the children”.

Once this starts it’ll be required for everything.

No, you made a series of claims above without evidence. Let’s start with your claim that instant gratification has spilled into the workplace and is a cause for the problems as you see them.

Yeah but are you going to back your statements above up with data or are these just your feelings?

Btw https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/kowtow

Disagree - there is a degree into which the needs of a managers direct report should be taken into account. Ignoring these needs in full comes with the risk of turnover and productivity loss. It’s a balancing act between business and employee needs. Again you’re taking it the the extreme by saying an employer should kowtow to the employee when the reality is that it should be a good balance in an ideal scenario and not entirely in either direction. A balance leads to the best outcomes for both parties.

As a native English speaker I fully agree that your intuition makes sense and I’ve also always hated this phrase because it does sound backwards.

Nope, this article focuses on just one side however it is and should be a two way mutually beneficial deal, like any successful relationship. Good managers understand their employees and work within business needs to make their people happy.

This is a good take but it disregards the realities of the financial recipients being unable to account for funds spent. I agree there are special circumstances but we need to have visibility to those realities as benefactors. Otherwise how can we allocate funds democratically.

Lol literally no way to find out because they don’t track it and have no reason to do it.

Or - and this is heavily documented - the US Military has never passed any audit since they began being audited. This is just part of that.

Doesn’t mean we don’t support Ukraine. Just means we need to hold the military accountable for the funds provided.

Not an argument at all but rather a discussion on what has been provided. I think we’re both in the same page in terms of support for Ukraine. We can always do more but I just wanted to provide insight into what has been done. Unfortunately the US isn’t all aligned on this issue which causes the roadblock.

From a policy perspective what would you like to see from the US?

https://www.ifw-kiel.de/topics/war-against-ukraine/ukraine-support-tracker/

For the context of this article the US has provided 43.9 billion in military aid (defined as military equipment or weapons) as opposed to the UK’s 6.57 Billion. By a large margin that is the most tangible assistance provided to Ukraine than any other country participating. The US could provide more funding, but money is not nearly as useful as already produced and available military equipment in the immediate term. I just hope the US can continue to assist, but Congress won’t pass anything it seems (see the less than 25 bills passed this session).

It’s looking like no one really knows - seeing mixed signals in the recent reporting. They are reporting higher GDP but the concern seems to be projected inflation increases and a possible housing bubble.

When diving into the reporting, I found some interesting nuggets referring to Putin directing his interior ministers toward manual economic controls since 2014. The thought is in mitigating crises (Crimea and now Ukraine). From looking at China, manual controls seem to work in the short term before mistakes set in long term. Curious to see how much longer Russia can hold out.

Yeah I did a bit of looking around recent headlines and see similar sentiments:

• https://www.ft.com/content/b3206a9f-e667-4e53-8a16-a8096188d4ae
• https://www.reuters.com/breakingviews/russias-economy-will-suffer-brawl-top-2023-12-18/

I guess we’ll see if they can dodge another bullet