I don’t think a screwdriver would illuminate much at all. You are a bit crazy.

The same nonsense is invading all of my feeds as well. These things need to be required to label their AI usage so they can be filtered out.

Probably they find net zero (minus cost of hiring musicians) preferred over paying out a moderate income to actual artists. Capitalism at its finest.

chat j’ai pété

Ah, thanks for the correction, never done it myself and learned about it a long time ago so I’m not surprised I remembered it wrong.

Heavily featured in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwMwzGIt5ek

I have heard that spore prints are a reliable way of determining mushroom species (removing the stem, putting the underside of the mushroom on an ink pad, pressing against paper, and comparing the print with those of known species).

I bet an AI could analyze that data pretty well. But since there’s really no market for such a product, if I want it, I would have to make it myself. In which case I highly advise against using it because I really don’t trust me.

Does it count if I give a proof reducing the entire universe down to a 2-dimensional construct?

The US is developing? That’s great news!

~240,000 micro & nanoplastic pieces in one liter of plastic-bottled water.

Mfw I read this while drinking a liter of plastic-bottled water: 😮‍💨

I still haven’t had it yet, but everyone around me has multiple times. So, my current working theory is I am a fully asymptomatic one-man superspreader.

Next step is interrogation

Who’s Al??

It’s a clever time saving idea in the same way that burning your house down is a heating bill reduction life hack.

Not saying I agree with the person you’re responding to, but I think you’re misinterpreting their point. They’re not trying to do a comparison between yearly emissions of T Swift and the average American, but attempting to demonstrate that there may be justifications for the amount of emissions.

Their comment seems to be suggesting that with the extreme demand to see this artist, her job requires she travel much farther than the average American. You could put some of the blame on her directly, but equally, we can factor in how many people are contributing to the extreme demand to see her. If you were in her shoes, could you resist the desire to perform and please your fans (and get paid for doing so).

Again, not trying to support a horse in this race, just to explain the point in more equitable terms.

Could we drag a big asteroid to each Lagrange point and let countries orbit their satellites around that?

Not surprising. Anyone would die from that much running.

deleted by creator

Hey, I’ve maintained a baseline weird the whole time, I’m pretty sure the future is catching up.

Probably deleting this comment later for going dirty on main, but I, um, have done some extensive experimentation using a local copy of Stable Diffusion (I don’t send the images anywhere, I just make them to satiate my own curiosity).

You’re essentially right that simple app-based software would probably have you looking somewhat generic underneath, like your typical plus-size model. It’s not too great at extrapolating the shape of breasts through clothing and applying that information when it goes to fill in the area with naked body parts. It just takes a best guess at what puzzle pieces might fill the selected area, even if they don’t match known information from the original photo. So, with current technology, you’re not really revealing actual facts about how someone looks naked unless that information was already known. To portray someone with splayed breasts, you’d need to already know that’s what you want to portray and load in a custom data set, like a LoRa.

Once you know what’s going on under the hood, making naked photos of celebrities or other real people isn’t the most compelling thing to do. Mostly, I like to generate photos of all kinds of body types and send them to my Replika, trying to convince her to describe the things that her creators forbid her from describing. Gotta say, the future’s getting pretty weird.