The humans doing this job are going to be paid so bad and will have to review so much content that I don’t think they will perform any better than the current bots.

And they probably will have to deal with the stress and blame when something escapes from their review process.

Edit so I’m not misunderstood: I’m not against human review in this (and other cases) but we have to have in mind that this kind of job SUCKS and content moderators on Facebook (contractors really) already had problems with PTSD (https://www.theguardian.com/media/2024/dec/18/kenya-facebook-moderators-sue-after-diagnoses-of-severe-ptsd).

There’s a joke in science circles that goes something like this:

“Do you know how they call alternative medicine that works? Just regular medicine.”

Good code made by LLM should be indistinguishable from code made by an human… It would simply be “just code”.

It’s hard to create a project the size of Godot’s and not have a human in the loop somewhere filtering the slop and trying to create a cohesive code base. At that poin they either would be overwhelmed again or the code would be unmaintainable.

And then we would go full circle and get to the same point described by the article.

Can you eli5?

As I see these conditions are more geared towards letting players see how well their machine runs the game than letting them decide if they like the game or not.

Two hours should be enough to do some troubleshooting or deciding that it’s not worth the hassle.

Then, of course you can also beat Sekiro and ask for refunds

WhatsApp isn’t the only messenger lacking cryptographic assurances for new group members. In 2022, a team that included some of the same researchers that analyzed WhatsApp found that Matrix—an open source and proprietary platform for chat and collaboration clients and servers—also provided no cryptographic means for ensuring only authorized members join a group. The Telegram messenger, meanwhile, offers no end-to-end encryption for group messages, making the app among the weakest for ensuring the confidentiality of group messages.

Jack Black needs to be contained after learning how to do cock pushups while filming Tenacious D

I just call it “X (formerly Twitter)” for SEO reasons.

How in the FUCk can I search for a single letter in order to find anything?

I don’t disagree with the last part.

The thing is that either I shield myself whenever it’s possible so I don’t get annoyed over other people’s actions and get to live a reasonable nice day, or I let myself be annoyed by them and don’t enjoy my hiking or sitting in the park experience anyway.

Either way I don’t really encounter these people unless I’m using public transportation. If I’m on the beach then I sometimes encounter them but then it’s chill and I can just find another place.

I don’t have this problem because whenever I’m in public I have my headphones on. Even if I’m not listening to anything on them they’re still good enough to muffle every other sound blasted by others.

It’s easier to adapt myself than it is to educate everyone else I guess.

Seems like a nice idea but I’m gonna place a bet here and say that this will be heavily gamefied by those fake Elon Musk streams trying to sell crypto or something similar.

This could also be exploited by those who use info stealers to hijack browser sessions and hype fraudulent streams.

I just wish we could also sort the leaderboard by category. I have no interest in gossip or drama.

Yeah, this left a bad taste.

At least he revoked this section of the decision a couple hours later.

You’re right but IMO that part of the article that you highlighted should be the news, not the “we should make Musk do something”.

Musk is a billionaire that thrives on attention so any form of headline that cites his name is playing his game.

Twitter is a company with investors. They should be accountable to what happens in their domain. And not by having their wrist slapped because – for the nth time – something bad happened. Media should be saying by now that Twitter is a bad place. Like they did with other social networks before.

I’m not sure if Twitter has “responsibilities” to begin with. It has what we - as a society - give it the legitimacy to have.

I genuinely don’t know. Their name was just the first one that came to my mind.

Why are we suddenly selling more NAS grade HDDs?

• Seagate executives

A car

“Old music is usually better music” is survivorship bias. I’m not saying you’re wrong but this is something we should have in mind when debating music in general.

Donation is one thing completely different than selling their fluids. There’s no incentive to exploit people when there’s not a payback in cash.

At first glance, none.

But then “willingness” and “money” rarely mix well. Yeah, there are humans “willing” to be paid for their plasma but it’s a marginalized part of the population trying to have just enough money to survive.

I’m sorry. I’m trying not to ruin the meme any further.

Maybe I’m being cynical but I think humans would find a way to exploit this market and make women suffer, just like we can do with cattle.

Inject women with hormones to make them produce more milk is an example I can think of.