• 0 Posts
  • 80 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2024

help-circle


  • mke@programming.devtomemes@lemmy.world•AI memes suck
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s not just that. If it was, I’d have been convinced by the new-era freedom fighters using fucking ai horde, or whatever sloppers call their latest open-source [citation needed] model instance.

    The biggest issue is the shameless, continuous abuse of creative workers by sucking up all their works without consent.


  • Turning it against itself my ass. This is promoting it. Legitimizing it. Normalizing its presence everywhere. Doing exactly what they want.

    They’re on a niche forum sharing convoluted AI slop, harming that which they claim to stand for. These aren’t freedom fighters subverting the system, they’re clowns.






  • mke@programming.devtoFediverse@lemmy.world•*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Given the breadth and depth of evidence of him being a horrible person and holding favorable views towards fascism/nazism (see him flirting with every far-right movement), calling it misconstrued is misrepresenting reality. He knows what he did.

    Unlike other commenters, I don’t think you’re necessarily a Nazi, but you are at least missing crucial information to make a proper judgment here. And, not to group you with them, but when you defend his Nazi salute, you’re not in good company.

    I hope you’ll reconsider your stance.



  • Most people know this in some capacity, but it’s not talked about enough: the shape of the platform massively shapes its culture. Every mechanism, intentional feature or not, is a factor in resulting user behavior and should be accounted for.

    Reddit Karma was (shitty) reputation from the start, but Slashdot user IDs became one despite being mere sequential identifiers; negative user feedback such as downvotes can be harmful to communities (yet, users without an outlet may lash out in other ways e.g. reports); even how the platform communicates with users influences them; and so on.

    I’m not saying you shouldn’t be nice and incentivize others to do the same, but unless the system naturally leads to the desired behavior, you’ll have a bad time in the long term because building culture by interactions doesn’t scale. By the time you realize there’s a shift, it’s too late; interactions will compound and affect how the average user acts faster than you can try to course-correct.

    I wish lemmy was more experimental, because by building a clone of reddit, we’ve copied too many of its faults. We’ve already got gatherings to complain about mods, and the one time devs considered changing a core component, discussion was killed by an onslaught of users. Problems with the current setup that were brought up then will likely never see that amount of people thinking about how to solve them.

    Contrast with Mastodon, which gets crap for not being a faithful copy of twitter, but their reasoning for not including quote-reblogs is understandable. They’re now putting a lot of thought into how to add them safely. Not ignoring functionality users want, but also not ignoring how it will affect culture, that’s compromise.

    I’d like it if we could talk more about how our platforms work and, particularly, how they affect us, because that’s a big way we can build better platforms, right up there with being nice.


  • mke@programming.devtoTechnology@lemmy.world•*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Apparently the dump doesn’t include media, though there’s ongoing discussion within wikimedia about changing that. It also seems likely to me that AI scrapers don’t care about externalizing costs onto others if it might mean a competitive advantage (e.g. most recent data, not having to spend time and resources developing dedicated ingestion systems for specific sites).

    I want to stress this: it’s not that “tech bros” are just stupid—even though a lot of them are revoltingly unappreciative of the giants whose sholders they stand on—it’s that they don’t care.


  • No one who uses Mozilla software wants more cloud shit or online services from Mozilla.

    I don’t think that’s unanimous. I’d like to use Firefox Relay, myself, and I’m willing to give thundermail a chance.

    Used to think I’d go full Proton eventually, but leaning more towards a diverse set of service providers, nowadays. It’s also my hope that these services allow Mozilla to depend less on companies like Google, and more on the users they ought to serve, which would be healthier for the org and better for users.






  • mke@programming.devtoTechnology@lemmy.world•*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Might be nicer if they just didn’t care.

    Check the comment section for the video version of this article by Niccolò, or the comment section of the post on r/browsers, or the replies whenever these issues are mentioned on Twitter, and so on, and you’ll find a bunch of brave people saying stuff like:

    you unintentionally just made me like brave over firefox. now i can switch to a chromium based browser and not even feel bad about it

    Yes i am installing Brave after this advertisment!

    Thanks to this video I deleted Brave then redownloaded it

    These were taken directly from the video. They’re on the mild side. Throw in also some “stop inserting politics (other than mine) into tech” comments, and a few homophobes not even trying to hide it. Rather than not caring, many of them like it a lot, especially the right-wing politics.

    I don’t think every Brave user is a cunt, but fucking hell, are loud cunts seemingly attracted to Brave.

    To folks bothered by this: know that the lead developer of Ladybird is a big fan of Brendan Eich.