
So you’re telling me one of the most capable surveillance states in the world couldn’t prevent it’s most thoroughly surveilled part of the population from somehow “stealing” the election?
Yeah seems plausible

So you’re telling me one of the most capable surveillance states in the world couldn’t prevent it’s most thoroughly surveilled part of the population from somehow “stealing” the election?
Yeah seems plausible

Noice! Now gimme gimme

Incredible foresight really
Or we could try to not live and consume resources at the scale of the average US household (let alone the accursed millionaire and billionaire classes).
Plenty of stuff to go around actually

Let me put it this way:
My grandparents built a brick house in the early 1950’s in northern Germany. My parents built on that foundation and doubled the size in the late 1980’s. Air conditioning was not a thing back then. You just didn’t need it at all.
For decades this house has kept a relatively cool 24-25°C (~75°F) during peak summer months. Just due to the way it was built.
That hasn’t been true for the past ~10 years anymore.
And it’s the same with almost all German infrastructure. Our traditional ways of building things are not fit for the frequent high heatwaves we’ve been experiencing this last decade. Even hospitals are generally not AC’d except for maybe ER and operating rooms. It’s fucking miserable

Elect them to positions of power?

First pay for the game, then pay for slop shit so you don’t have to play the game. Corporate big brain time at its best 😄

Also would it really be Random Access Memory? Seems like we would have to optimize a lot of things for sequential data access
You gotta make it pass

I’m always wondering with situations like these… In civil law you have the notion of a frivolous lawsuit to fight back against people trying to attack you through clearly unfounded claims using the court system.
What about criminal law? Is there any recourse against a prosecutor or at least the state bringing in these clearly false charges and using it as a weapon to supress dissent and terrorize a populace into submission?

You’re probably writing that on a device that has a secure boot chain. So far it was there without strict enforcement, but once the manufacturers decide you only get your shit signed if you implement $ARBITRARY_ORWELLIAN_GOV_RULE, you’re pretty much fucked.

Was gonna say… who’s SS Ulrich and why does he have a church 😅

*Bored of Peace

Does a bear shit in the woods?

Wait so far these things are relatively trivial pieces of equipment in terms of software, no? Read instructions, move stepper motors/control heating elements.
So realistically what we’re looking at is hash based block lists for known firearm and parts designs, which would be trivial to circumvent by adding the equivalent of noop instructions to the .gcode files 🤷♂️

Ask yourself why the AI industry turned to HDDs

Next stop BBC



It’s still extremely shitty unethical behavior in my book since the negative impact is not felt by the organization that’s failing to validate their inputs, but your peers who are potentially being screwed out of a review process and a spot in a journal or conference
You wouldn’t believe the things I’ve seen