You also get hit with an underpayment penalty if you do this and don’t pay estimated taxes too.

Very interesting thanks for the explanation.

I think that makes some sense to me. I’m moderately familiar with signatures and encryption. I’m going to do some more research into blind signatures now since that’s one thing I have never had to implement.

Without doing that research, I still feel that the bank or whatever could store the signature info at the time of signing with the account that requested it, but perhaps the blind signing even protects against that if the verification process is done in some way that the original signing request info isn’t present in the same form.

Anyway, thanks for the response!

How would one acquire tokens anonymously but in a way that you can verify that you acquired genuine tokens, and what keeps those tokens from being given to multiple people? This is really where the privacy aspects fall down. It’s a hard problem to solve in Bitcoin, but at least you can have Bitcoin ATMs that you can verify that you received the funds.

A Taler ATM it seems could issue invalid tokens or issue the same tokens to every client and there would be no way to know until you tried to spend it or deposit it in your account (thus defeating the anonymity).

House passed it. Doubtful that this senate will pass it. Senate still has some people looking out for themselves and knowing that cutting Medicare/Medicaid to the levels in this bill is a death sentence to their campaigns. For instance, see Sen. Hawley’s opposition to it (and Hawley is otherwise a huge POS).