31·
3 months agoYou are wrong and incapable of admitting it. Downvoting your comment is an efficient way of signaling that.
- 0 Posts
- 20 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: September 1st, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
32·3 months agoAlso look at animal agriculture which we also do not need
I can eat steak. I cannot eat AI.
- Making code easier to write exacerbates our existing issues with review bandwidth.
Man, so much this. LLM written code is, most of the time, both excessively verbose, and overly complicated.
Also, I’ve found myself asking more about “why” than “how” in my reviews. Why is this loop here, why is this one liner method used only once, why do these five tests do the same thing. I’ve reached a point where I feel like I’m gaslighting myself into thinking that I’m constantly missing something, because nothing makes sense from an engineering perspective anymore.
Someone give this woman a bible:
Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s.
They didn’t. They are active in Mastodon.
Is this article AI generated? It seems to wander and repeat itself instead of being well-structured like a standard three-part article (background, analysis, conclusion).
It very much is. The same user has also been systematically sharing content from this blog across half a dozen communities.
I wouldn’t be surprised if this was a bot.
81·3 months agoThere’s always room for reasonable disagreement when the issue in question is a word whose definition contains an element of intent and is therefore unfalsifiable.
This sounds to me that you would rather discuss semantics, than spend five minutes trying to actually falsify the term “genocide” when applied to Palestine [0] [1] [2]
These links alone are enough to prove intent from the defence ministry.
Again, yeah, they will obey Swiss law, exactly what it says in their marketing material. Shocker.
I’m curious to know if you really believe that there are companies out there that would break the law in order to protect their users, and if so, which ones.
Oh no, Proton PR is pro Bernie Sanders?
You can’t say Proton is legally mandated to violate privacy while pushing a Proton-backed page that says
I can absolutely say that. Because as much as a trumper you think the CEO is, Proton wouldn’t collaborate with the DOJ under such scenario unless they wanted to be screwed in the courts of the country they operate from. But if they receive a lawful requirement that, under Swiss law, needs to be fulfilled, then they must.
You believe that Switzerland is some sort of haven where international law doesn’t apply. That’s not true. You believe that Swiss law only applies in one direction, i.e. individual privacy protection, but not in any other, i.e. lawful data sharing requests from law enforcement. Then the issue is what you chose to believe. Here’s the thing: any company offering a service must comply with the laws of the country they are based on. And if you think that there are commercial mail providers that would rather cease operations before handing data to law enforcement, oh boy do I have news for you.
At the time it was true, corporate dems were way more likely to be in bed with big tech. That’s just a fact.
The “it doesn’t matter” part of the blog post is also dangerously inaccurate, implying any privacy violation in Switzerland is illegal while, in reality, Swiss authorities have gotten Proton to disclose user data several times in high-profile incidents. Here’s the biggest one in my mind. And another and another.
Ah, I remember you now. You’re the guy who thinks that privacy equals absolute immunity from court orders! That’s never the case and will never be.
I suppose we read different things, because what they said is that republicans aren’t “friendly with big tech” and that’s a good thing. There are other blog posts where they explain their position in detail, like https://proton.me/blog/trump-control-nsa-privacy
I’m familiar with this link though.
Yours doesn’t load for me.
You may be familiar, but you refuse to argue on its merits and sources, of which there are plenty.
And by the way, if we were to talk astroturfing, there are a handful of accounts in this community that consistently post negative comments about Proton. I’m not saying this is an orchestrated attack against them, but it’s really damn suspicious that in every topic tangential to privacy or VPNs, there’s always someone mentioning how awful Proton is.
The CEO didn’t support Trump: https://medium.com/@ovenplayer/does-proton-really-support-trump-a-deeper-analysis-and-surprising-findings-aed4fee4305e
Obvious troll is obvious.
From where?
I know people who moved from America and Asia and they had to prove that they had at least 15,000 euro in the bank as students. I also know that for the non lucrative visa that could be twice as much. These requirements are dropped if employed by a Spanish company, but honestly that’s quite rare.
Right, I’m just saying it’s not as easy as you think it is.
This MBA mf has been the CEO during the worst security disasters in Palo Alto history, and now he thinks AI is the future of the company?
To what? And for what purpose?
Uh, I don’t think it’s that easy, though. For instance, non EU residents cannot get a work visa unless they are sponsored by Spanish companies and have proof that they will be earning “adequate” wages, typically more than 20,000 euro a year.
That site doesn’t address residency or visa requirements. But I can confirm, they are different depending on the country of origin and destination.
How dare they. We should also demand that they bring back support for i386 and SUN-4.