Helix 🧬

What’s the failure mode? Higher operating temperatures?

download the entire netflix library forever.

I’m pretty sure this is larger than 14TB?!

Honestly if you use Claude just tell it to set it up for you.

Not the point of a homelab and additionally very dangerous as Claude tends to like insecure configurations.

Yes, but competition is good for innovation. They learn things we can all learn from, and the other browsers are harder to contribute to.

If you use TLS like you should, your domains will be on the internet in the certificate transparency log. Yes, you should use a wildcard cert if you want this security by obscurity, but it’s still security by obscurity.

Technically it’s another 3%!

Who cares, just fake it till you make it.

Yes

Ads are bloat aswell.

Control. I want to control what my PC does and when it reboots. With Microsoft Windows and Apple macOS both I don’t have control, these US-based corporations can do to my PC whatever they choose to. With those operating systems I don’t feel in control.

I also wondered why this is a big news. Usually those tools are tried and tested over years of development and only run once a day or boot or even less. Don’t know if it has that much of an impact.

It’s cool and all, kudos to the devs, but idk why it’s posted here and an article is written about it.

preparation for systemd compatibility, none of which should be a big deal.

I mean there are systemd haters questioning anyone’s sanity who is daring enough to do that…

Or you run ncdu and save some keystrokes.

That’s stderr, not stdout

reply from Peter Hutterer

Not to dunk on his achievements, but his argument is basically that it doesn’t matter because the end user doesn’t see any libwacom branding.

However, when they upgrade their package, it will show the Wacom name. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to rename the project to something which is more descriptive, especially since it contains way more than Wacom code.

I can understand both sides. I also think that you shouldn’t bow to corporate interests in general, for example to marketing departments of any company.

However by keeping the Wacom name you’re basically giving them special treatment just because they came first. Vendor neutral projects should be named vendor-neutrally, IMHO.

Can you edit your post to be shorter and more concise and add an AI disclaimer about how much of your project is done with AI and in which capacity you use LLMs to write it?

I just love how they’re actually doing a better job than a multi billion dollar company.

KDE gets more features with less resource usage while Windows 11’s UI loses features and still their resource usage grows.

No one does that in a project they’re building for themselves.

Speak for yourself, I always did that and I found it easier with LLMs nowadays.

I hate most AI shite with a passion but when it helps my colleagues write commits which are more than “add stuff”, “fix some things” I’m fine with it.

I rarely use AI to generate code, usually only when I need a starting point. It’s much easier to unfuck AI code than to stare blankly at a screen for an hour. I’d never commit code I don’t fully understand or have read to the last byte.

I hope OP is doing the same. LLMs fail at 90% of coding tasks for me but for the other 10% (mostly writing tests, readmes, boilerplate) it’s really OK for productivity.

Ethics of LLMs aside, if you use them for exactly what they’re built for – being a supercharged glorified autocomplete – they’re cool. As soon as you try to use them for something else like “autocompletion from zero” aka “creativity”, they fail spectacularly.

Ah, React JS, not React OS. Was excited for a second there.

Yeah, I have a QL-570 and it works fine.