

Oooooo interesting! Is ilthe reasoning the possible accidents?


Oooooo interesting! Is ilthe reasoning the possible accidents?


‘RSF advisers have said they believed the truce would be used to facilitate the delivery of food and ammunition to the army’s “besieged militias” inside el-Fasher.’
The reasoning of the blockade is to kill their enemies and they could not care less who else dies along?
I do not understand the fight for power in such conditions. I don’t get how we allow ourselves to come to this level of pain pf others.


Reading the article, it seems like badly regulated procurement processes with a company that did not meet the criteria to begin with.
Poor results on people with darker skin colour are a known issue. However, the article says its training data containes ONLY white patients. The issue is not hate against AI, it’s about what the tools can do with obviously problematic data.
Unless the article is lying, these are valid concerns that have nothing to do with hating on AI, it has all to do with the minimal requirements for health AI tools.


So neither men nor women want to get married under the currebt circumstances.


That is a different narravite


Their stance is ‘this is everybody’s fault but us’


That is that person’s face. Not AI generated.


Same law for Sweden


Exactly. Same reason why we cannot let presidents put directors of central banks whenever.
However a term length seems reasonable.


There is enough proof in the trials to show they were not unhappily contributing to paramilitary groups.


More like the banana lords would pay money to the paramilitary groups to keep unions and others out of the picture


Exactly my point but better worded than I could do mysel.


Are we now also blaming the gay for this?
Heeey yeeeey yeeeeey