à la con
tchncs-identity-proof-9a18102f366a4f35
- 0 Posts
- 13 Comments
51·1 year agoI’ve used rmarkdown back when i was in academia, having dabbled in jupyter years before. I think the main issue with literate programming is knowing your target audience. people differ wildly in their tech skills, and i guess that those people who use literate programming to its potential are the same who are happy to use org-mode.
others just copy paste their analysis scripts they cobbled together into whatever interface and copy the result into word and start formatting.
just a thought
yes, in the game of Skat, but it’s a verb in the 3rd person singular as in “[sth.] trumps [sth.]”
maybe this might help you at least a little https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/getting-started/dependabot-quickstart-guide
from the movie Ghost with Demi Moore and Patrick Swayze
absolutely agree. i just wanted to point out that not everything has to be a video
totally agree with reading more. text is easy to consume, easy to store, (somewhat) easy to verify (if sources are provided), and it keeps (if using dead trees for storage). ever since the pandemic i started reading more and must say i really like it
should be a typo.
it’s 10 Zentner (50kg) so 250kg total.
thanks for the reply, but i think i got that. from the linked article:
For example, if you changed repo/packages/foo/CHANGELOG.json, when git was getting ready to do the push, it was generating a diff against repo/packages/bar/CHANGELOG.json! This meant we were in many occasions just pushing the entire file again and again, which could be 10s of MBs per file in some cases, and you can imagine in a repo our size, how that would be a problem.
but wouldn’t these erroneous diffs not show up in
git diff? it seems that they were pushing (maybe automatically?)without inspecting the diffs first
maybe I’m missing something but wouldn’t this show up in a diff before pushing?
it is about a fake compiler but the article is interesting. thanks for sharing