It’ll be even funnier if it happens a third time.

The customer is a Fae

Taco probably won’t do it anyways

Am I out of touch? No, its the faculty who are wrong.

Safety concerns aside, you should trust your partner enough to not need to track them

The tracking happens even with a big reflector/scatterer on your head, but as long as you dont wear it regularly, the system would have difficulty identifying you from wave propagation alone

Ironically, a tin foil hat would probably work to prevent that kind of surveillance

Another interesting deterrent is to poison unruly scrapers with infinite nonsense via Markov chains https://algorithmic-sabotage.github.io/asrg/trapping-ai/

I wonder what the success rate is if you verify using AI generated faces (assuming they cheap out and you dont have to provide camera access)

A modern day Don Quixote

We’ll need a private-watching private to stand guard

He was vibe-coding in production. Am I reading that right? Sounds like an intern-level mistake.

Raw-dogging the internet without an adblocker is about as irresponsible as not using contraception

Meta is a security threat outside of Russia too. No privacy should be expected when using their services

The doctor says he’s fit as a horse

“Mission success”

Or maybe it was more like a robotaxi wheelchair that violates traffic laws and drives automatically into oncoming traffic.

They’re mad they can’t use cellbrite to snoop on properly configured GOS phones and that they actually have to do real police work to catch drug dealers

Y’all remember that #DeathTo Black Mirror episode?