I don’t know choosing to not feed people when there is enough food to feed everyone seems a lot worse than choosing which people to not feed during a time of famine.

Obviously more people die from the famine, but at least that’s due to a lack of resources and not a manufactured scarcity

As opposed to the current time of surplus and abundance where it is if “you don’t work you don’t eat”. Which is morally a lot worse considering there is more than enough food to feed everyone

If it’s removable you can much more easily recycle it though. Sustainably that is much much better than average phones.

However, while more sustainable than current it is not the most sustainable if you charge it like that

There’s the law and there’s what’s right. They don’t always overlap

if you health is bad there are special programs for that.

Hate that, work until you’re 70 and too old to enjoy retirement. Or work until you’re so sick you can’t and then you don’t get to enjoy retirement.

A system designed to ensure you work until your labor has no value. Squeezing for everything you’re worth

Don’t take all the blame from the US. We didn’t have to be Israel’s bitch

America

Too late we’re already there

I’m hoping this is the death of the republican party and the dems split and create a new progressive party. Placing the current dems as the new “right”.

Not ideal and still lacks a lot of necessary reform, but I’m hoping this is plausible

If we make it out the other end the bastard should hang for treason

This is what I saw. She also married into the family and inherited her deceased husbands wealth.

Still obscenely rich, but she has nothing to do with the company

You can’t take away their hobbies that’s unfair. Just think of those poor officers

The article implied this is within historic norms for civil rights protests in the US

Per the article:

47% of U.S. adults disapprove of of deploying the Marines to LA, with 34% approval.

45% disapprove the National Guard deployment, while 38% said they approve.

That leaves 19% and 17% that are undecided. The question for those would be are they uninterested or uninformed?

Then as I said we’re already cooked. But also that is demonstrably false anyway. Our judiciary is under heavy threat, but still functioning

I doubt they will find anything of use. The most powerful thing I can do is slow them down. It’s the best use of my privilege

I bring my phone. I likely won’t be breaking any laws, and I can afford a lawyer. So yeah arrest me and waste the system’s time. Just another data point they have to sort.

And if it gets to the point where none of that matters we were cooked anyway

They do not decide who is allowed to run for office though and independents can and do win races.

And frankly the last thing I want to do is change the system to create more private organizations like political parties.

I hear where you are coming from, but the law descends from the will of the people or at least it should.

Allowing a body independent from government oversight decide who is allowed to be a lawyer and therefore a judge is a terrible idea though. Currently each state has an independent BAR association that decides who can and cannot practice law within the state. Handing over full judiciary control to a private organization like that is a terrible idea.

That’s creating a body of government not controlled by the people at all. I don’t like that.

If there was a recall process then maybe