Depends on the book and depends on the subject.

Some people are able to Crush sizable books in a few hours

Does this dude still not understand that he has to read the information presented to him?

Could we say there’s a difference in rhetoric not action?

People already think chatGPT is a general AI. We need more articles like this showing is ineffectiveness at being intelligent. Besides it helps find a limitations of this technology so that we can hopefully use it to argue against every single place

Articles like this are good because it exposes the flaws with the ai and that it can’t be trusted with complex multi step tasks.

Helps people see that think AI is close to a human that its not and its missing critical functionality

No idea. It’s not like a particular country that Associates itself heavily with Judaism is doing anything that’s particularly egregious such as a genocide /s

Damn straight and coach would make you run the whole thing again as a cool down.

Well that was what we called naked running

Back in my day we just called this “running”

Man the US was really on something when they wanted to abolish ICE a few years ago

Nationalism helps hold these projects together. That’s why fascist push for it so much

Do people not remember that they didn’t have cars until like 1920? Do people not understand that most roads weren’t paved until like the 50s? It’s foolish to think we’re the only generation living through lifetime events. Motherfuckers they were people that went through World War I and World War II. They were veterans of World War 1 that enlisted in World War II. There are people born in the fifties that lived through the computer Revolution. Do people not understand that the internet is only 30 years old?

I think it just shows all the hideousness of humanity and all it’s glory in a way that we have never confronted before. It’s shatters the illusion the humanity has grown from its barbaric ways.

Duh. This why no one should have this tech as the arbiters can never be trusted with public saftey/good.

Nice to see the FED stuff but as far as the case by case basis for remote work that’s basically just a line being fed. No one’s going to get that approved. I’ve had these games played with my own remote work and yeah when they mean you need to come in the office 4 days a week they really want you to come in five and you’ll be ostracized if you don’t. Really sucks because working remotely offers a whole degree of Freedom that apparently the elite do not want us to have.

I mean yeah I know most pirates won’t use Google and will use other search engines but the majority of people using the internet don’t even know that there are other search engines to use. Keeping them off Google is effective at preventing them from reaching other people.

The point I was addressing is that the supreme Court shouldn’t strike this law down as it doesn’t affect ownership of guns. If the guy’s a felon he probably should not have had a firearm but I can understand why he would want one.

No. Good luck on your crusade.

I see your mind is made up on this topic. You also haven’t addressed anything I have said. Good talk.

I wouldn’t focus on his plea. He’s likely doing this on the advice of his lawyer to secure plea deal. Initial charges always very harsh and this is a pretty common tactic in American court. It’s like companies who won’t say “you’re sorry” because it opens them up to liability.