Here’s another one for you. If our Galaxy is full of Dark Matter that doesn’t interact with anything wouldn’t a whole bunch of it end up in the middle of our planet and every star? Thus making them way heavier and invalidating the paradox we see?
Thanks! It’s so weird the commonly understood kind of antimatter in sci-fi is totally different from reality.
Not sure exactly but neutrons are* a proton and an electron getting intimate with each other so yes? Not decay, what you’re describing would be separating DARK MATTER in this stupid unproven head-theory I wrote out.
In the real world only cosmic rays smashing particles in space like nature’s particle accelerator can produce anti-protons
*Obviously the star because hadrons are way more complicated than that
Posting here because I saw it on reddit and had interesting thoughts and questions about it and I can’t post there - isn’t antimatter like a positron just oppositely charged form of all particles (or opposite in all forces I guess).
They annihilate because they have anti-mass, but since anti-mass is hypothetical at this point, if mass turned out to be an absolute property of the higgs field, antimatter and matter colliding could result in these massive particles that can no longer possibly interact with anything. Isn’t that what Dark Matter is? Seems we have a lot of that stuff floating around.
I thought about the paradox of why matter. If any of the cyclical universe theories turned out to be correct then in that situation it would SEEM obvious the next universe would be antimatter right. Just swinging back and forth through the singularity like a pendulum. Infinite conservation of energy forever, and we happen to be in the matter part.
This weirdo theory would imply information being maintained through a singularity though, is that a thing? but if every particle is a singularity anyway can’t they just chill together.
I saw another unhinged amateur theory a few weeks ago also on reddit that Dark Matter was the next universe moving backward through time.
I want to hear what the people way smarter than me did to absolutely tear this apart because I’m sure it’s been picked apart to death. Did you guys ever touch on antimatter in your physics classes? It’s a lot of fun.
Removed by mod
When you say those words do you imagine normal people reading this and not laughing
The deeper I get into this platform the more I realize the guise of being ‘progressive, left, privacy-conscious, tech inclined’ is literally the opposite.
??? So why don’t we get better at making energy than get scared about using a renewable resource. Fuck it let’s just go back to the printing press.
Amazing to me how stuff like this gets upvoted on a supposedly progressive platform.
Now this is something I can get behind. But I was talking about the decision to retaliate in the first place.
Why?? Please make this make sense. Having AI to help with coding is ideal and the greatest immediate use case probably. The web is an open resource. Why die on this stupid hill instead of advocating for a privacy argument that actually matters?
Edit: Okay got it. Hinder significant human progress because a company I don’t like might make some more money from something I said in public, which has been a thing literally forever. You guys really lack a lot of life skills about how the world really works huh?
deleted by creator
Here’s my prediction. Over the next couple decades the internet is going to be so saturated with fake shit and fake people, it’ll become impossible to use effectively, like cable television. After this happens for a while, someone is going to create a fast private internet, like a whole new protocol, and it’s going to require ID verification (fortunately automated by AI) to use. Your name, age, and country and state are all public to everybody else and embedded into the protocol.
The new ‘humans only’ internet will be the new streaming and eventually it’ll take over the web (until they eventually figure out how to ruin that too). In the meantime, they’ll continue to exploit the infested hellscape internet because everybody’s grandma and grampa are still on it.
I thought this should be obvious to anyone who’s interacted with an animal, ever. But sadly there are a great many people who don’t agree there is a ‘soul behind the tv screen’ as it were with animals more primitive than things like cats and dogs. It can be easy to use to justify human cruelty.
And it’s easy for you to say it’s obvious and you’ve thought that all along. You’re not the demographic they’re trying to inform.
Probably the userbase so far. Love the platform. The political stuff on here especially seems like it comes from people who’ve never been laid or been able to hold a serious conversation in public.
I mean, for some of the stuff I’ve seen here I wouldn’t even necessarily disagree with a comment like this but the OP saying advertising violates journalistic integrity has literally nothing to do with that. That’s just common sense.
In opposition to popular sentiment, good journalism actually does make money. It just doesn’t make as much money. And bad journalism without advertising makes no money.
I can’t see how that’s ever arguable since Apple has only been about premium high-end products since Jobs took over. That’s literally the opposite of Henry Ford.
It’s almost like… endless growth is unsustainable.
Edit: Downvoted by a shareholder lol
Oh no, speculators’ third party products don’t work. Anyway… get a real job fuckface.
I just really wish there was more active communities for things I like.
I made the Path of Exile community which is currently empty.
There’s no Burning Man community yet for SOME UNKNOWN REASON
All the EDM communities are dead including the one I made.
Send Help!