It’s still less broad at least

By the broadness of the definition presented, I would say that soldiers killing soldiers instills terror in soldiers, so therefore it would still cover them. But to be clear, I disagree with a definition so broad

Wouldn’t that just cover both sides of every war?

All gas/diesel engines are motors, both by dictionary definition and colloquially. Nobody calls an electric motor a DC engine, but that has nothing to do with gas engines regularly being called motors.

Or, I’ll just keep calling them engines/motors like everyone else does. Also, I am a car type.

In the United States, it’s called the department of motor vehicles. It would be pretty weird if almost all motor vehicles lacked motors.

KIA may not agree with that, but they’re also wrong. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/motor

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/motor

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/motor

https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/motor

Hopefully I don’t need to keep linking dictionaries.

Engines are a type of motor