

I would give this kind-of-opposite answer, if otherwise my answer would be far, far longer.
If someone asks which ice cream flavours you like and you can just say “Raspberry I don’t like, that’s it”, no need to go through hundreds of options.


I would give this kind-of-opposite answer, if otherwise my answer would be far, far longer.
If someone asks which ice cream flavours you like and you can just say “Raspberry I don’t like, that’s it”, no need to go through hundreds of options.
Yeah I wish it was a more common understanding that your code files are just documents that describe the processes of your business.
If you have a process that nobody dares to touch anymore because it’s too messy, you have a document that holds part of your business hostage.
It forces you to stagnate in the areas described by the document, and you can work around that for quite a while, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t do any harm.
Not rage, more disapproval or disgust. And I had to think why it’s so unsettling first, but I think I got it:
Because of the vanity of making it about themselves.
Doesn’t help that most of the time they get so many upvotes exactly because so many people think the same thing. Simplified, someone posts “what is your favorite color”, and they get thousands of upvotes on a comment that says “red”. That’s not about cumguzzler69’s comment writing career.
But no, this is their peaking in highschool moment, gotta make thousands more read some useless fluff text showing they are under the impression everybody thinks they are so great that it warrants an award speech.
That’s why it’s not the same if it’s a long comment where somebody put some real effort into explaining something from their area of expertise, and things like that.
I mean, I understand the first 15 minute talk with some hiring manager, before the real interview, to align rough expectations and filter out absolute zeroes without bothering the skilled workers. I wouldn’t want to talk to all of them either when I got work to do.
But yeah it’s crazy out there.
I now start seeing a trend that boobs are censored. Like, not naked boobs, but literally just the chest area of fully clothed women.
And from previous experiences with censorship, that’s just gonna be a thing now probably. Absurd.
??? Bro complaining how tired he is after working 30 minutes, I guess


I got the same feeling that it shouldn’t be rocket science. Then again, I’m most experienced with C#, which is just a very clean and professional ecosystem, and I often experience that other languages can feel rough around the edges in comparison. E.g. in npm JS, different package managers create entirely different folder structures, even though the build system is 100% the same!
So maybe a package manager for C# would be straightforward, while npm JS would require a bunch of research about what happens behind the scenes.
And if other languages are similar to npm JS, it’s easy to imagine that your want to keep languages separated for cleanliness - but then you kinda just get a bunch of one-language-package managers in a trenchcoat, so why even bother. OR you have the same code handling it all, becoming a bit of a mess.


You mean like JAQing off? Like trolls?


I guess nowadays it is relevant to note that “slammed” was physical, instead of a couple negative words.


As somebody who was able to see those before they got defederated: If they’re not denying stuff like that Russia is the aggressor, then they have improved and the common conscious is just slow to forgive.
It was “they must be trolls” levels when I still saw them. Pure ragebait levels. And you did often get the feeling that they were just trying to be as edgy as possible.


Well… so is a hammer.
And if that fits the definition now, we probably strayed too far from the original intention of this post by now.


Well it’s my point that the question “is X a Y” is not answered by listing shared facts of X and Y.
Those facts need to be part of THE DEFINITION of Y to be relevant.
If you start from that end with the Wikipedia definition, you can stop 4 words in: “Cults are social groups[…]”. AI is not a social group, therefore AI is not a cult.


Nah.
We have pattern recognition. You recognize some similar patterns between these 2 things. Nothing wrong with that, but doesn’t mean that it means anything.
In fact, most things you can find some similarities between. You could probably replace one of your 2 things with, say, “marriage”, and still go through the same points, and think of something to say about it.


Lol agree, but it’s “hear”, like “listen to this”
Already any plans for becoming childless?


I’m sure many of us would prefer “Fuck you, Endymion”.
It’s never good enough