Not if you move back into your mom’s basement

The article is just talking about selling AI generated 3d models on a marketplace, so maybe for that use case it has no exchange value.

That doesn’t mean everything generated by AI has no value. It doesn’t even mean that AI generated 3d models have no value, people may be using AI to generate models for themselves and getting value from it, even if they can’t sell that on a marketplace.

It’d be like saying a scarf I knitted has no value, I may not be able to sell it because it’s not as good as professionally made scarves and has some colors that don’t sell well, but it still has value to me because I like the colors and it keeps my neck warm.

That actually seems pretty comprehensible…

Yeah, according to this article it says they use a diamond wafer on the CPU, but there is current research into getting the diamond as close to, or even directly on the silicon.

Time to see if burnham at least says something or if he’s just as spineless as keir and sweeps it under the rug.

Inb4 they just start building them off grid with diesel generators, and they can’t do anything about it because Exxon lobbied the Texas government to make the “right to bear diesel generators” constitutionally protected.

Good to see AIPAC flush $30 million down the drain

Idk, if it’s an explicit thirst trap account that’s plugging for OF or something then it’s fine to post that since they’ll probably appreciate the engagement.

But yeah your right 99% of the time, just like making unsolicited comments to strangers irl is wrong 99% of the time unless it’s in a strip club where the women presumably want that kind of attention.

Why do they keep trying to pull this bullshit?, they’re a luxury brand, there margins should be pretty good without trying to nickel and dime everything

I can understand why this technology would be particularly addicting to hank.

His whole persona is answering questions like “what color flower do bees like the most” with the kind of enthusiasm that shows his curiosity and deep passion for science. So a machine where you can put in those sorts of questions and get an almost instant answer would be very addicting.

There wasn’t an intervention, he asked them about his AI use in response to the outrage and they agreed he’d been using it unhealthy.

Seemed to me more along the lines of “do I have too much salt?” , “yeah you should cut back” ; Then “your coke problem is tearing this family apart”

To be fair the other options was Google just using reddit content without there permission, like every other service, and not getting payed at all.

One easy solution, just cede ceuta to Morocco, why is that little spit of land spains any way?

Don’t use AI for this kind of advice.

Why? It basically gave the same advice as you:

Can dogs eat cheese, onions, garlic, grapes or chocolate?

Claude sonnet:

Short answer: cheese is mostly fine in small amounts; onions, garlic, grapes, and chocolate are all dangerous and should be avoided entirely. …

It went on to explain why each is toxic.

Not saying it’s more reliable then a vet , but it’s just as reliable as strangers on the Internet.

the list for anyone wondering

Just know that everyone on that list is a violent extremist including me

Been feeling this lately with HBO, there app has gone to shit and I’m debating just pirating “the wire” instead of going through the service that we (my partners parents) already pay for

It’s nationalism, guys like this think AGI is just around the corner and whoever gets it first will become a god, so anyone in the west calling to slow things down on AI is helping the Chinese communists win.

And at that point wouldn’t the solar panels act as a sail and fuck with the data centers orbit?

What exactly is this for? I understand LLMs have there limits with understanding physical reality, but at least they have a use case of theoretically automating the “symbolic work” ie moving symbols around on a screen or piece of paper, that white collar workers do.

Yes it’ll never be able to cook a meal or change a lightbulb, but neither will this without a significant enhancement in robotics to embody this AI. What’s the use case? Being able to better tell you how to throw a ball then a person?

I mean he is sort of right on this bill, no one will really notice it or give a shit.

Republicans, along with a lot of democrats, don’t actually want housing affordability because that would require home prices to go down and most of their constituents, especially those who vote, are home owners and don’t want that to happen.

Their only solution is to make it easier to borrow more money so they can keep house prices inflated while allowing some new people to enter into the market with bigger and bigger debt.