

I doubt this is about “attraction” (quotes because that is too nice a word). Much more likely they want compromising material to gain a political advantage. No less despicable, probably more so.


I doubt this is about “attraction” (quotes because that is too nice a word). Much more likely they want compromising material to gain a political advantage. No less despicable, probably more so.


Yes. Either they are incompetent with no control over their models and need to be dismantled or they are in control, malicious and need to be dismantled. Am I missing anything here?


2/2 wins and they cancelled it, gj paramount


I hope this brings stoat.chat more attention. It’s promising, but not at the same level in terms of features.


The thing is they aren’t (yet). It looks like the EU might be thinking about introducing some sort of requirement for age verification, but it’s nowhere near decided enough for Discord to demand it globally. There are also methods of age verification that are much better and more secure than what they will use, like the German AusweisApp.


Care to elaborate?


Maybe I can bring myself to be excited about it by the time we know if it’s actually any good, for now though I couldn’t care less. Give me Lower Decks season 6.

This is what bothers critics of carbon capture […].
Far from the only thing that bothers critics, the part where CC results in more CO2 output for all the energy it needs is usually the first thing mentioned. Even if you run CC 100% on renewables, you would still be better of replacing fossil fuels in use elsewhere with renewables then using renewables on CC.
423.9 ppm of CO2 is a chemical imbalance for sure