Hello_there

I’m more upset by the word ‘Resto’ in the title

Looks like someone never tried to use Skype UI back in the day. It was different from, and substantially worse than, all the other messaging and voice programs out there.

600k for causing a mass migration. Fuck that and fuck CEO compensation in general

No shit

They need competition. But the imported cars are being heavily subsidized by China to build the market.

Maybe let the tiny cars in? Because there’s minimal competition there at the moment and people would buy the heck out of a cheap small car. Maybe will push market in right direction

Law states that legality of crossing has no effect on validity of asylum cases. I guess we’re ok with doing whatever we want to cater to a republican base that won’t vote for a dem.

So is trader joes

Seems like going into exile would have been the better option

Press x to doubt

I had no idea but a quick search shows most teabags have plastics.
Not sure if there’s a difference between microwaving a bag in water or letting a bag sit in hot water

Don’t knock it til you try it. Cold water and bag goes in a mug in microwave. 1-2 mins later tea comes out. No forgetting about hot water or letting things cool and forgetting about it. I dont care if it’s correct. It tastes good to me.

Because NH got their panties in a twist and decided that their miniscule state needs to be first? They can go fuck off.

What about the pee?

I can take the entirety of Harry Potter, run it thru chat gpt to ‘rewrite in the style of Lord of the rings’, and rename the characters. Assuming it all works correctly, everything should be reworded. But, I would get deservedly sued into the ground.
News articles might be a different subject matter, but a blatant rewording of each sentence, line by line, still seems like a valid copyright claim.
You have to add context or nuance or use multiple sources. Some kind of original thought. You can’t just wholly repackage someone else’s work and profit off of that.

I doubt they did the ‘rewrote this text like this’ prompt you state. This would just come out in any trial if it was that simple and would be a giant black mark on the paper for filing a frivolous lawsuit.

If we rule that out, then it means that gpt had article text in its knowledge base, and nyt was able to get it to copy that text out in its response.
Even that is problematic. Either gpt does this a lot and usually rewrites it better, or it does that sometimes. Both are copyright offenses.

Nyt has copyright over its article text, and they didn’t give license to gpt to reproduce it. Even if they had to coax the text out thru lots of prompts and creative trial and error, it still stands that gpt copied text and reproduced it and made money off that act without the agreement of the rights holder.

Next time that I’m caught speeding, I’ll just claim that I didn’t know that speeding was illegal. That should work.

Black mirror shit. Who thinks reading an empathy script from an AI model is a good idea?

The Florida of California strikes again

Misleading title. There have been more than 400 missile strikes in Gaza in the last month alone.

Mush didn’t found Tesla. He bought it later and put in the contract that he was able to call himself a founder