• 0 Posts
  • 196 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 18th, 2023

help-circle




  • I’m left with a lot of questions though, as the scope of the article is quite limited.

    Short-haul flight are banned, so the gains seem obvious. But the article doesn’t seem to detail if they’re actually substituted by rail. Travellers could also be going by car, search for destinations further away, maybe not go at all.

    I guess it’s quite hard to find an actual effect from a broader perspective, but if their expectations are true, travellers using rail should have a noticable increase. It’s a shame this is missing in the article.

    Basically the article is saying that if you scrap a bunch of flights, emissions by aviations go down. Maybe I’m missing the point, but that seems pretty obvious. I’d like to know what the actual broader effect is of these measures taken.





  • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.comtomemes@lemmy.world•Traitors
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    3 months ago

    We once ran a trial at work for a lead generation software.

    It could show who visited your website, what company they worked for, how to contact them, their socials and even a video of exactly where they pointed and clicked their mouse.

    No sign up required, all by fingerprinting.

    Shit was creepy as fuck, glad we don’t use it anymore.

    It also made me realize fingerprinting is almost impossible to avoid. There’s so many little things gathered to identify you, it seems unavoidable to be traced.