fwiw it sounds like you may need to take a breath too.

Free Couch is a legit banger imo

https://youtu.be/A72HyxRBgco?si=pV_rhwyIVe8dpQUK

You’re very smart. I didn’t realize that until you called someone a goof, idiot and moron, but now it’s very clear that you have far superior intelligence.

Thank you for your service 🫡

Because that one was over double the length of the record before it and this one is closer to a 35% increase.

Piffle

to talk or act in a trivial, inept, or ineffective way

Thanks for the new to me word!

Love Scott Manley!

After looking up Cleo Abram I remembered I watched a video where she was hanging out with a paleontologist and that I enjoyed how geeked out she was to find some fossils :) I’ll check out those shorts! Shorts are nice with the kids too. They’re still a bit younger but are curious so that may be the perfect length.

Awesome, thanks for the recommendations!

I’ll have to take a closer look at Nebula and CuriosityStream. I think they come up in ads enough that they wind up on my mental ad blocker so I’ve never looked closely at them :)

Great lengths are gone to, to avoid responding to direct questions. If you can accuse the other person of being in a bad group (bot, capitalist, not actually left, from an instance I don’t like, etc) then you can avoid reflecting on your own philosophies and the flaws that exist in it. Cognitive dissonance avoided and upvotes gained, pretty compelling for our brains.

That your girlfriend?

These are screenshots and don’t prove anything.

deleted by creator

What was breathless about the article? Seemed pretty matter of fact in its presentation.

I get why people throw that stat around but I don’t think it’s a fair way to view the sport. You can go in and only focus on those minutes but if you’re choosing to watch closely there’s lots in the middle bits too. It’s probably better to think of that stat as time of action. During that time there’s a chance to analyze how the teams are setting up, what movement and audibles are they making, consider strategy and future actions, etc.

I think probably most of our activities have an ebb and flow and highlighting only one aspect of it would certainly empower someone to try to ridicule or treat it as a waste of time.

Just trying to offer a different perspective because I do think the risk of concussion is worth highlighting but your ignorance is on display which can take away from the argument I think your trying to make.

I see what you’re saying but I do think it’s important to mention his duty as a father is to be there for his kid and extrajudicial “justice” means this father will be in jail causing further trauma for his kid and severely restrict his ability to be a father.

Whoa, were you there?

Why are there quotes around that? Is that a quote from someone?

K

I’m whooshing on this one :)

But as far as know, nothing in the cop rule book says an anaconda can’t be a cop.

Weird, I want cops to not strangle someone because they may have used a fake bill, or shoot someone because they were called there to help with a mental health crisis, or shoot someone because they busted into the wrong apartment, or to flash bang a baby.

But I suppose that means I want them to be kind to someone actively shooting kids.