This latest Rom Com is so realistic, but did we have to stop the plot every time a character needed to take a shit?
Talking nonsense since 1986
This latest Rom Com is so realistic, but did we have to stop the plot every time a character needed to take a shit?


After surviving the Southport stabbings, Leanne Lucas launched the “Let’s Be Blunt” campaign, calling for safer, rounded-tip kitchen knives instead of pointed ones.
Just feels so short-sighted. There are plenty of other sharp objects in the world. Someone motivated to get a weapon is unlikely to just give up because kitchen knives are round tipped


Got to train the staff, and for that you’ll need a consultancy firm to deliver the full package of workshops, videos, quizes and one-to-one sessions


I remember watching this in school… as a treat


Largely similar to what you have, but abstracting away the metalware and reframing as human-centric.
If the user is at the center, surrounded by more users, making primary & secondary connections, in an approximate circle shape. You can then show traditional social media owners as wedges of that circle, containing (owning) a fraction of the users & preventing connection to others, vs. Fedi that lets you connect to everyone.


I’d say these fall into the same trap that most fediverse explainers fall into — too focused on implementation details, not the experience. The average FB user thinks they’re connecting to friends directly, not really considering the system architecture that powers it.
I’d like a graphic that shows how centralised media blocks connections to others outside thier walled garden.


If new users were asked to pick 3 or more topics from the top 10, then the most relevant instance could be assigned
I’m gonna say the direction of the shadow helps sell the illusion of sun overhead


“In this country, you gotta make the money first. Then when you get the money, you get the power. Then when you get the power, then you get the women.”


World War 3: Panama Rift


Obvioisly if someone’s on speaker phone it’s because they want you to join in the conversation. It’s your duty to gather round and give your loud & uninformed opinions


Why not both? Stop future production and remove what’s already out there


Looks like Techradar misunderstood parts of the source story. The projected emissions over the next 10 years is equal to 40% of all US emissions. The Register


Confirmation bias: all the shite furniture from 1800s has rotted to dust already
Edit for full disclosure: I’ve exclusively bought antique furniture. I’m basically a shill for big-auction
So… easy workaround then? It’s just my personal content bro, not at all paid for by the state/business interests