This wouldn’t be necessary if more of the Internet used AO3 tagging and category systems

Based on the number of c levels I deal with daily who can’t function without AI, I certainly knew this

That’s…how you check for prostate cancer

I think it’s the 18 that’ll turn away some

She’s been a beaten wife for a while now who puts on a thick layer of makeup to save face but these last few years there have been cracks in her mask. Glimmers of being fed up with the shit that the current leadership has been forcing down our throat. False optimism does not help but optimism as a way to fortify enough to follow through with ousting the current regime and start repairing the damage caused does.

The fact that a supposed safe district was so thoroughly flipped is a hint towards even more in less safe areas.

He took the KISS method of advertising/marketing. Slap the brand name on everything you can to squeeze out as much money from the "fan base"as possible

They were not. Even if they were, typically, mmr is pretty standard for the parents and anyone else who will be coming into contact with a child too young. Because this is the result otherwise

Small but important point. We’ve been an oligarchy for a while now. We’re just losing the pretense of it being a democracy.

I had thought of that possibility and decided to go with the happier option. I also don’t want to think too hard about the entire probable series of events. Surface level is sad enough

Not technically alone but if he had advanced enough in the disease, he would probably not notice that anything has happened…

If only it mattered

“when the president does it, it isn’t illegal”

I like how you think they’d have to be a US company to donate

Those same ones who cry 2nd amendment are the ones who got taken.

Unfortunately, the ones who told these idiots that they were idiots are also the same people who want to “take away their guns” and aren’t generally the type to use the 2nd amendment as it was intended. :/

It would be if they didn’t consistently spin the failures onto their defacto opponents and their base willfully taking their word at face value despite actual evidence to the contrary.

What I’d like to become the standard is:

If the question makes it super obvious the asker has zero clue what they’re asking or trying to do, lightly correct and steer them to beginner friendly resources.

If the question is competent but focusing the wrong direction or will lead to a bad habit, essentially, they know just enough to be dangerous but they’re about to be dangerous, more pointed and technical correction and steering them to either articles or better search terms to use.

If it’s a pointed question with the information to show they’ve done the normal information gathering and either need opinions that are beyond the theory or book standard information or they don’t answer the question, answer the question. Ideally also giving sources to back up your answers.

Bonus points if you can do the above without coming across as a dick. Unless they ask to ask. You can be a dick to those people.

That doesn’t exactly equate to constantly writing well. I’ve met many engineers and scientists (computer or otherwise) who couldn’t give 2 shits about proper English unless it was specifically for a grade, sending to clients, or publication.

Educated doesn’t mean that you stop writing informally. It just means you’re able to write formally.

If the transcript I’ve seen floating around is accurate, the phrase “this was fairly trivial” absolutely was about how difficult it was to pull off. The lines above and below it talk about super basic social engineering that anyone could do and the hard part of the tool engineering has already been done.

They’re being called radical Marxists, communists, etc

Hopefully not enough to cover all debts still owed. I want him fully bled dry