• 0 Posts
  • 22 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 20th, 2024

help-circle




  • From The Three-Body Problem by Cixin Liu:

    Later, other Adventists based their hatred of the human race on other foundations, not limited to issues such as the environment or warfare. Some raised their hatred to very abstract, philosophical levels. Unlike how they would be imagined later, most of them were realists, and did not place too much hope in the alien civilization they served either. Their betrayal was based only on their despair and hatred of the human race. Mike Evans gave the Adventists their motto: We don’t know what extraterrestrial civilization is like, but we know humanity.










  • DABDA@lemm.eetoFediverse@lemmy.world•*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    This wasn’t an innocent request for interesting topics to follow, it was taking the stance that only serious topics get discussed here and it’s boring:

    I’d like to see the fedi let its hair down a bit. It’s okay to talk about stuff other than infosec, privacy guides, distros, and Gaza.

    It wasn’t a demand, but certainly requesting that we “let our hair down a bit” and that they “often get bored of the Fediverse.”

    This post could have been phrased as “What are some good non-political or news related communities?” And I’ll gladly accept the label of being elitist if it’s because I have minimal expectations that people explore for solutions before complaining and implying it’s everyone else that needs to change. You can’t browse all without easily bumping into the things I listed, and if you aren’t aware there’s different filtering options there’s always a sidebar link instructing you how the platform works.



  • DABDA@lemm.eetoFediverse@lemmy.world•*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 years ago

    Yeah, where’s the fun? There’s no posts about owls/bats/invertebrates/cats/dogs, no cooking or food posts, no pictures of people knitting socks, nobody asking general questions, no articles and pictures about space, no discussion around movies/tv/books, nobody ever posts about gaming of any kind, there’s no memes to be found anywhere, no poems or short stories, no digital/traditional/AI art.

    For some reason browsing news/politics/technology always seems to revolve around depressing and infuriating topics which is different from every other platform.



  • the more you need click bait pages to drive ad views on those exchanges

    “They” (the local newspapers) don’t have to make that Faustian bargain but choose to because it’s easier or more lucrative to. They could take meaningful steps to address and communicate to their readers that they care about the accuracy and informative aspects of their reporting as well as the safety and respect of their electronic systems used to access it.

    Wikipedia doesn’t have flashing boner pill pop-ups and their pages aren’t filled with intentionally misleading information – I strongly suspect their donations would fall off a cliff if that started to change. It’s not a great comparison since the scale and business structures are different from local newspapers but other entities like PBS also show that people will donate for good/honest content.

    Ad blockers just wrongly get painted with this brush as being horribly destructive to the poor companies that have no choice but to be evil when they were a logical consequence to the boundaries of acceptability being constantly pushed. We had and text, static banners -> animated banners, auto-playing sound/video, iFrames -> pop-ups -> recursive pop-ups -> mouse click & window resize disable scripts -> overlays -> unskippable full-page video -> multiple unskippable videos -> LLM/AI generated bogus content. And tons of other variations I’m not remembering at the moment. Ad blockers also (mostly) don’t work properly when the ads are being served from the same source as the content; the newspapers could host the ads themselves and vouch for their safety and propriety.


  • The primary use of ad blockers isn’t to ensure the websites don’t make money but to protect the end user from unwanted effects of intrusive advertising. If we’re expected to be concerned with their loss of revenue they should be as concerned about ads masquerading as OS prompts, scams feigning legitimacy, false medical or financial claims, malware and miners being injected etc. If they won’t accept responsibility or accountability for the material they are serving and effectively endorsing then it’s only prudent for the users to protect themselves.

    And if they want to attract subscribers instead of relying on advertising income then they should also avoid racing to the bottom by (solely) relying on LLM generated “articles” and misleading clickbait tactics. If they have to rely on tricking their prospective customers then they aren’t peddling something actually worthwhile and aren’t owed a reward for doing so.