CobraCommander

If I don’t call out bad behaviour it will continue. As it stands doing nothing is only harmful for PyLova who has it’s unique features copied at each step.

He exported the code as a patch, while not knowing it would make her (correctly) the author. His intention very clearly looks to be as if to use her code without bringing over the authorship. And he did do exactly that later on with copying the themes and renaming it.

So yes I believe that warrants calling out at the time he did steal the code.

I am not saying he stole the code here, I am simply saying he is jacking the new features being introduced in an effort to harm PyLova by making it not be able to stand out with unique features. These are really the only big new user facing features he is adding and it’s conveniently shortly after we do.

It is?

https://quokk.au/c/fediverse@lemmy.world/p/1281812/pylova-v0-5-0-shareable-blocklists-roles-ui-changes

https://quokk.au/c/fediverse@lemmy.world/p/1237518/pylova-v0-4-1-customisation-performance-qol-bugs

https://quokk.au/c/fediverse@lemmy.world/p/1214229/pylova-v0-4-0-moderation-community-management-tools-galore

https://quokk.au/c/fediverse@lemmy.world/p/1135278/pylova-v0-3-2-released-muffles-reels-flags-bookmarks-and-more

https://quokk.au/c/fediverse@lemmy.world/p/1105596/pylova-v0-3-1-released-multi-image-post-support

https://quokk.au/c/fediverse@lemmy.world/p/1092867/pylova-v0-3-0-released

https://quokk.au/c/fediverse@lemmy.world/p/1077126/pylova-v0-2-2-released

Rimu is welcome to bring over PyLova code, he only needs to attribute it instead of deliberately removing the author from the work as he did last time and has been well documented in his conversation with others admitting trying to do.

I don’t want to get too off-topic here, so I’ll message you.

These are only being added straight after PyLova does it. And considering Rimu’s hostile history it’s clearly an attempt to try to ensure PyLova cannot gain traction with its own unique feature sets.

And the way they are being added is not compatible with PyLova’s methods. Which breaks Fediverse compatibility. If any software such as Lemmy were to implement it in the future they would most likely ensure compatibility with the larger userbase PieFed model.

This is the similar to Microsoft’s “Embrace, extend, and extinguish” philosophy to kill off the competition.

The fork split off 7 months ago, PyLova independently added these features weeks and months before PieFed ever did.

And it has now been confirmed that Rimu has made it non-compatible.

PyLova already had this feature, does PieFeds work with it or is it breaking Fediverse compatibility?

Funny how PieFed gets multiple images in posts, and now in-line comment editing/shared blocklists after PyLova introduces it. Does PieFed have any original ideas?

I just don’t have friends to ica.

Or PyLova which has some really cool features, and responds to users ideas.

I’ve got grievances with PieFed, but even I don’t think it’s ai slop.

Aww it’s a little CowBee, here to spread more misinformation.

This the same intelligence community that told the world there was WMDs in Iraq?

Feels like they want something to pressure Nvidia leadership with more than anything.

Tankie was made by leftists to describe authcoms support for the Soviets after they used tanks on a student protest in Hungary.

You can literally see the screenshot where they say being transgender is actually a bourgeoisie conspiracy. Like full on denying trans people’s lived experiences for thousands of years, and in the same breath pretending people like Elon and JK Rowling aren’t pushing transphobia.

Yes.

PieFed only adds those checkboxes (multiple times now) after huge complaints from users.

The dev is an authoritarian liberal who thinks the best way to run the Fediverse is their way and everyone must accept that.

If anyone wants, I’ve created a tankie blocklist.

https://quokk.au/blocklist/triad-b-gone

Msg me if you have any ideas for what else to add.

Comment up higher has context. He got banned for some Islamophobic reporting.