Activist investors threaten to toss the board.

The fact that they keep talking about it is suspect. They are trying to sway opinions in the public. It’s a very guilty look.

Dear UK: please stop trying to mimic all the various contortions of America as it dies. It’s gauche.

I didn’t defend tesla at any point. You injected it that for your own personal narrative to make sense.

No, I get it. You could resist the opportunity.

I sure the victim and her family appreciates you guys using her death to drag Tesla despite being on a platform where almost everyone is in agreement.

Are you suggesting the system should ignore full pedal press?

I started playing GTA 5 shortly after launch and could make the same statement.

I’ve bought launch day on this series for a few iterations now.

Yeah! Don’t unsell our stupidity and failures! We’ve work tirelessly to be proudly ignorant. Stupid intellectuals trying to give us the benefit of the doubt are the real no brian morans!

Telescopes caused autism.

Yep. All the tax events we do are reported directory to the IRS. The audit system knows what we owe and will triggered letters and eventually garnishments.

It’s why is so ridiculous they don’t autofile. No some free form system but literally just send it to use an invoice.

Imagine if our utilities work this. Oops you miss read your water meter, here’s an update bill with fees and interest automatically added. Oh, you don’t have the funds? No problem, we’ve drained all your bank accounts.

It is the advertising of any market differentiator or specifically when it’s for security.

Then it doesn’t happen. Your fear is not my fear.

Would you rather they ended up with zero dollars?

Yes.

The only terms under which I could potential accept tax money being used to save a company from a collapse leading to massive layoffs, is if the resulting company is also made entirely employee owned.

When you take into account inflation and the overall market gains over that time, they absolutely did not make their money back.

I’ve been using the tagging feature exclusively for these people. I don’t want to block anyone so I give them my Scarlett letter. Then I know to skip past their commentary on any topic that is so much as poltical adjacent.

I did try to engage originally but it’s literally like talking to Trump supporters online, they immediately go for personal attacks and any evidence that goes against their belief system is ignored.

Lemmy is just people who don’t like things.

And it’s all incredibly lower effort distastes. I wonder how much of it is because there is an non-insignificant portion of the user base that came here not by choice but because they’re too toxic for Reddit and got account banned.

Our code enforcement people don’t cite the individual workers until their third trip to the site in which they’re told to stop.

It’s incredibly frustrating how everyone thinks the government shoild just steal roll over people on these things. These things are done this way because sometimes the fine is wrong.

Everyone wants heavy immediate enforcement until they are the target and enforcement notice.

Having a vendor explicitly supporting it…epic is an understatement.

But in that link:

it is unknown whether Nobel Prize winners are more prone to this tendency than other individuals.

Later there is Freedman quote about how he has been asked about topics he has no expertise in because he has Nobel. But that makes it an issue for people who are elevating a Nobel prize winners opinions of those topics. It’s seems unreasonable to expect Nobel prize winners to self censor in an effort to avoid this.

Citation needed.

Everything I’ve read indicates well educated people, specifically those with high analytical a abilities are less susceptible.

Education isn’t immunity. And not everyone who claims they are educated as well educated, but people aren’t earning nobels after barely passing some certification program.