Boomkop3

Oh no! Shell lied… again… and again… and again… and noe again? Who could’ve seen that coming?

If you just want a secure connection, you can use a reverse proxy with certbot and nginx. Plenty of people have already done this and you can find their work on hub.docker.com

They are not. We’re ankle deep in shit, let try to not go knee deep.

Why did firefox kill pwa support on desktop?

Firefox’ tabs are so darn bad tho. It really bothers me I can’t just drag them around

I gotta watch that, thanks!

I use centimeters, and meters. The us can go sit in a corner and contemplate their failure in feet and inches

Someone didn’t actually read the article, dang op. You can do better.

It’s not that the power plant depended on the weather, but rather that the river life depended on not being boiled alive. Just like a coal or gas power plant, water is needed for cooling, which means the waste heats ends up in a nearby river.

But unlike coal or gas, nuclear doesn’t also produce a tonne of carbon dioxide. And oddly enough, a coal power plant would be more radioactive than a nuclear plant.

62% jump of what? Pizza consumption?

Ahh, in amount of forest that’s been burned. I see how the title is ambiguous. Welp, it’s going to get worse as the climate heats up. But to be fair, they’re comparing this event against the average. I don’t know how much it varies year to year.

Either way, this was one of the worst fires in decades

Same here in the Netherlands, sucks to be American I guess :p

Ye I expect so, I don’t like the way this author just doesn’t bother explaining her points. She just states that she disagrees and says they should be left to their own rules.

Which is probably fine, but that’s just lazy or she’s not mentioning the difference for another reason

She names Trump’s points explicitly, but doesn’t go beyond “the best practices of this and that institution”.

I can’t say they’re wrong, I expect a scientific institution to have some integrity to say the least. But either she’s too lazy to look them up, or she’s not quoting any for a different reason

If only there was some sort of governing organization that’s supposed to protect us from unfair labour practices and exploitation

Just going by this article I can’t quite tell whether either party has good intentions. Except for that the writer here does not

Roll you own “platinum standard” and see if he buys it :p

Ah, then they don’t have to worry

Why does github have access to your bank account?

It’s easy to deny it’s built on stolen content and difficult to prove. And AI companies know this, and have gotten caught stealing shitty drawings from children and buying user data that should’ve been private

Ye, same for mine. I just told the landlord I won’t be using the gas heater. It’s up to him to prove otherwise

Absolutely true, but not as cheap. I’d absolutely use one if I had the option tho. An electric heater is easier to put in a rental apartment