Taken from top result on google, so obviously not the best source, with that said
Seeing “sugar alcohols” in the ingredient list may be the only clue that erythritol is present in the food.
So you can’t necessarily even find it without some serious digging, so it doesn’t matter if they picked 2 or 100 examples, if they don’t clearly state it anyway.
My guess is you posted this on the wrong post.
I agree wholeheartedly. Even if the state doesn’t allow for a retrial, her conviction should be removed. Like you said it only matters ethically
It absolutely should matter if she did the deed, as that makes her a murderer, but I will concede that if they used corrupt means to convict her it does invalidate the whole process.
There is a very fine balance to be struck here that I don’t think I can do justice.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but for things that are made in both Canada and the US, if you increase demand for the version made in Canada, your country benefits, while hurting the US, since less is sold, so less money earned. Citizens are the ones paying tariffs anyway
Having just read it, it comes down to a CO2 tax on animals in general and not just cows and pigs.
“En CO2-afgift på udledninger fra husdyr. Der indføres en afgift på 300 kroner per ton CO2 i 2030 stigende til 750 kroner per ton CO2 i 2035 med et bundfradrag på 60 procent. Den effektive afgift vil dermed udgøre 120 kroner per ton i 2030 stigende til 300 kroner per ton i 2035.”
Posted the actual Danish text in case someone wants to translate into their own native languages in case of specifics. I’m surprised the agricultural workers agreed to this.
For part two, we don’t breed bison and elk in Denmark. Pigs and Cows are pretty much the only animals we breed that we also eat. We have sheeps too, but not in the same proportion.
I think they meant that people do not see people left of the center looking to fix those issues, so it’s not surprising that people vote for the right.
Same for Denmark, at least back when I last checked in 2018.
More than half the world? We talking population or countries?
Seems like an awful lot, but I have no idea about vaccines in other countries. Also do you only need 1 vaccine against measles once in your life or does it require a 2nd one later in life?
Since I agree with you, I’m interested in your opinion of where a potential cut-off point would be. Say X% of people between the ages 18 and 25 get into a car crash yearly, when is it okay to assume that because you are between 18 and 25 you shouldn’t be allowed to drive? Is it when X = 75, lower/higher or is there never a point for you and you’d still prefer to judge an individual?
Does this mean my first review has to be a 3+ star one or does it only start after, say 5 reviews? I’m okay with either tbh