Fully support using opnsense buuut pfsense has a good guide for doing this exact thing. It works really well.

https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/recipes/virtualize-proxmox-ve.html

People recommending against proxmox don’t understand how good zfs is, but their points are valid for this being a sole point of failure. I virtualize pfsense to gain cluster advantages but tend to leave not too much else on that box.

If you don’t pass through the card the VM can more easily be restored to dissimilar hardware. But those ports are dedicated to the pfsense/opnsense VM, leaving the single free port for proxmox management and VMs. I would enable VLANs for network segments but if you either don’t have switches that support tags or are new to all of this it’s going to be WAY less headache to just use it all untagged for now. (Spend time on funner things, seriously!)

Not Proxmox! Use it for free at home, but buy it for your business if you can! (But they never force you to)

/hoping it doesn’t bite the dust too

Very much on purpose. Might’ve a long time ago if I didn’t mind losing physical buttons. Before the nazi tires were revealed, now the vehicles themselves don’t matter at all. I’ll never buy one.

Says the person who hasn’t answered a question straight yet.

Who can’t understand a simple premise.

Let me make it super simple for you: should a person be able to say someone else said something they didn’t say?

Not false. If you could read. Answer the first question first.

Says the person who hasn’t answered a single question.

There was no clearer way to admit you knew you were wrong from the very beginning. Especially when I asked you to state my argument and you couldn’t do it.

Potato.

Broken record bro.

I explained that. You are a dog with a bone. Just as sharp too - can’t remember the question you’ve just been asked. And been asked so many times.

So. Many. Times.

And again, no you haven’t gotten it remotely right. You’re furious and you don’t even know about what.

Beating on a straw man. Furious, he sits at the straw man: everyone agrees you’re wrong! Why won’t you see!?!

I’m sitting over here like lol this has nothing to do with me. You go be mad at yo’ little self and the straw man. Get ‘im! rofl.

Everything u say is a an intended distraction from your initial massive failure. Can’t handle being so wrong, can ya?

You can’t do it can you? Because you already did go back, recognized how badly you fucked up, and are now like a dog with a bone; too dumb to understand both original comment’s references and that saying “look how many ppl downvoted you” has zero bearing on factual correctness.

You keep saying you did state my point to ensure you understand it. Link it.

You can’t do it, can you?

You really don’t get it? Oh my.

Let’s see if you can take the first baby step. What do you think my argument is? If you can’t do that then I can’t help you any more.

Oh my sweet summer child https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Appeal-to-Authority

Did not miss it just thought you were lazy, and I was right. You’ve never even heard of logical fallacies, have you?

Quick review: I fully understand your point, as demonstrated by you not correcting me, despite being repeatedly challenged to do so. You think you understand mine, but do not. And never have. Which is why you’re so full of yourself here. Again, laughably so.

You couldn’t argue your way out of a paper bag. Proof: this discussion. You don’t even know which way is up.

I do appreciate the fun though.

lol @ copy and paste. You’re committing a second logical fallacy: appeal to authority.

Still so wrong “bro”

You’re out here swinging on a straw man if you can’t restate what you think my position is, and have it be remotely accurate. Which, so far, you’re not even close.

Did I summarize your position well enough? Any clarifications?

How can you be arguing with someone and not even know what their position is? No, none of your prior posts come close.

Naw, screw “know” - you’re fucking clueless. You have no idea and are screaming into the wind.

You got it wrong and aren’t willing to recognize that. The fact that you can’t even paraphrase my point (no matter how wrong you think I am) shows just how out of your depth that you are.

What do you think my original point was?

Yours was essentially “it doesn’t matter if he said addiction or not, he was dodging the question. All the evidence points towards him claiming that much usage is not an addiction.”