• Jo Miran
    link
    fedilink
    1339 months ago

    …maybe leave these places if they can.

    These laws are targeted towards poor women who can’t fight back. This one is making the news because she’s suing. I guarantee that if an attorney hasn’t taken up the fight, you’d never hear about it.

    • @persolb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      309 months ago

      This seems like a good place for a charity… although the cost isn’t just a bus ticket but also probably temporary housing/income as well.

      Shit. I just realized I’m suggesting a refugee agency for US states.

    • SirStumps
      link
      fedilink
      179 months ago

      I completely agree with your statement. The issue with OPs statement is that it’s ideal for those with means but unrealistic for those without.

      • @afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        79 months ago

        In some ways the opposite. When I left my shit tier flyover village I had nothing. Nothing was connecting me back home and there was no backup plan. It would be a lot more difficult for me to move now given all the roots I have put down.

        What we think we control ends up controlling us. That mortgage that was supposed to make us free of landlords, that house we can’t sell, that car that we struggle to find parking for, that career we worked so hard on building. I am not advocating giving anything up I am pointing out you have absolute freedom when you have nothing to lose and can’t stay where you are.

    • @Crow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      49 months ago

      If you are poor, wouldn’t it make more sense to be poor somewhere else? Starting over when you never had much would be my top priority rather than stay in these places.