@PythOnRails@programming.dev to Programming@programming.dev • 1 year ago"Useless syntax sugar": Numbered block parameters in Rubyzverok.spaceexternal-linkmessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up145arrow-down13cross-posted to: hackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up142arrow-down1external-link"Useless syntax sugar": Numbered block parameters in Rubyzverok.space@PythOnRails@programming.dev to Programming@programming.dev • 1 year agomessage-square21fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@derp.foo
minus-square@jeffhykin@lemm.eelinkfedilink2•1 year agoIs it just me or does it feel kinda unclean for it to just support 1 through 9?
minus-squareEager EaglelinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agotbf positional arguments are already bad enough. Now if you’re using over 9 positional args… just take a break, go for a short walk, and maybe you’ll come back with a better plan
Is it just me or does it feel kinda unclean for it to just support 1 through 9?
tbf positional arguments are already bad enough. Now if you’re using over 9 positional args… just take a break, go for a short walk, and maybe you’ll come back with a better plan