The Moral Case for No Longer Engaging With Elon Musk’s X::The former Twitter is incentivizing violent content, which will only become worse to stand out to users.

  • ram
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They tend to mirror the content on other sites, so they can further grow their communities there too. Can you explain to me how Twitter remains integral when the content is available elsewhere too?

    • @TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s integral to them because the bulk of their audience, including crowdfunders and commissioners and other potential paying customers, remains there. It can be a difference between having a viable artistic career or needing another job. Xitter is in clear decline and worse by the day, but it still outnumbers the alternatives by hundreds of millions of active users.

      • ram
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Then the solution is for people who like art to accept invites and follow them on BlueSky.

        Or to use Mastodon.

        it still outnumbers the alternatives by hundreds of millions of active users.

        Hundreds of millions of those active users don’t care about art unless Elon’s stealing it.

        • @TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          It’s definitely better for them to move out but that’s a whole process, if they want to try to bring even a fraction of their audience along.

          Hundreds of millions of those active users don’t care about art unless Elon’s stealing it.

          Eh, by that measure there’s nowhere to go, because even here I see some people with a wild disregard towards art.

          But really, there are people who care or those artists wouldn’t ever have had a career to begin with.