My how fast the AI tech bros move to protect corporations but don’t move to protect the average coder, artists, writers.

  • tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Don’t worry! Its STILL okay to reverse engineer the work of photographers artists writers actors voice over musicians modelers animators academics etc etc (feel free to add. the exploitation is literally everywhere!)

    • Leon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      Only if you’re a corporation! If you’re a filthy worker then you have no rights.

  • Darkard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 days ago

    The “There’s no way we can stop our agents from going rogue” people, suddenly have a burst of ability to reign in their creation when it suits their interests.

    Funny that…

    • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      Does anyone think that perhaps what they are afraid is that source code of such clone would be compared to the original and show evidence that maybe the model was already trained on the code of the game?

      • MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        I think this is definitely a concern, yes.

        I think it’s very likely that these models are effectively being tricked into retrieving source code of projects from memory of seeing the actual source code in the biases. This is why some project are much easier to uncover than others.

        • abadidonque@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          I’m no expert, but if my understanding of LLMs as ‘probability calculators’ is correct, then if you prompted one properly to produce code which does x (a Photoshop function for example) and it had only been trained on one example of this (the Photoshop source code) it would reproduce the PS source code because that has the highest probability of that being the correct ‘answer’.

          • Kichae@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 days ago

            This is baasically correct, though what the models actually produce is a little more randomized than that. Though, if there aren’t any words that are anywhere cllose to being likely to follow next, then there won’t be a any other valid options to choose.

        • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          The models are essentially a giant lossy compression applied to the training data.

          They don’t store the loseless version of the training data sure, but that doesn’t mean it can’t reproduce something close enough to it, it’s literally how the whole thing works.

        • chisel@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          It’s long been proven that LLMs can produce exact copies of their training data. Not every piece of training data, of course, but enough where spitting out exact replicas of proprietary code is a legitimate concern. Not to mention that copies don’t need to be exact in order to be a problem.

  • paydequeso@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 days ago

    The purpose of Al is to allow wealth to access skill while removing from the skilled the ability to access wealth.

      • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        The purpose of capitalism is to leverage capital (assets) for private enterprise. It’s objective seems accumulation, but it’s really just human nature. People hoard, and wealth seems akin to hoarding.

    • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Pretty much. Regardless of AI, workers, white, blue, even managers, are nothing more than a cost account to the majority of corporations.

    • DandomRude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 days ago

      Yes, apparently they’re suddenly worried that stealing other people’s work—which is their business model—might backfire on them. I assume this is a measure intended to give the impression—in the face of one of the countless lawsuits against Anthropic—that they’re actually taking licensing or intellectual property rights seriously. I can’t think of any other explanation, because Anthropic simply can’t afford to have questions raised about where the training data used by their models actually comes from.

      • zarathustrad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        Pulling up the stolen ladder before anyone can steal it to use to steal more stuff while it’s still enforceable to do so.

        Mabey just make all ladders illegal, unless you have a government contracted monopoly.

        The entire idea of copyright is going to be tested at many levels, and most people don’t even understand why yet.

        Interesting times.

        • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          Government contracted monopoly

          You mean like when that town tried to force an xAI data center to not use methane turbines, and they got shut down by the government because the military was allegedly using Grok?

    • damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      No, they just enabled Chinese LLMs to be the forefront of reverse engineering. Because people will do what they want to do.

      • TheFogan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        No, they just enabled Chinese LLMs to be the forefront of reverse engineering. Because people will do what they want to do.

        Their goal is simple… everything they are doing right now is striving to make the US ban individual hardware.

        Chinese models are open, anyone can get them… stopping the flow of data on private computers is impossible. Hardware however is getting more expensive, hardware manufacturers are already deciding to move out of the consumer market on their own. The US government is already establishing laws to prevent shipping foreign hardware into the country.

        Altman’s giving the game away when he does this “it’s so sad that all this ram is sitting around in people’s home computers unappreciated when it could do so much more in a data center”.

        The idea is to sell the message "AI is out of the bag, and it’s world ending technology. Basically they are going to imply that the guardrails in their data centers are the only thing that’s preventing all AIs from destroying the software industry, and teaching teenagers to build bombs and hacking the CIA, and the only possible response would be to stop all direct to consumer hardware sales with anything more than the bare minimum needed to stream a PC out of a data center.

        • Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          This is all pretty obvious and I agree. They can no longer protect their imaginary property if they allow it to be ran in your computer’s memory or stored on your computers hard drive.

          The cat is definitely out of the bag, as in their own AI models are making them obselete. The race to make money before the end is what motivates them. They will ride the roller coaster to our societal demise because they only care about money. These people shouldn’t be in charge of a small fast food restaurant let alone multi-billion dollar companies.

  • ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    This is part of the reason they don’t want anyone running models locally offline, the models and their entire business are commoditized

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    To those who say “but what about game preservation?”:

    GenAI slop ruined communities around game preservation. And for every time a AAA dev getting this treatment, there’s at least 3 indies getting it worse.

    • bollvirtuoso@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Would you spend 13 years making GTA VI if it was going to be cracked day 1? Why bother? Just let the users vibe code it.

  • criss_cross@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    It’s probably done via a system prompt and not actual weights, so you could probably work around it if you say the right things.

    But yeah this is very much “rules for thee not for me”

    • dgdft@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Yeah, it’s sysprompt only, so you can trivially sidestep it via:

      • Jailbreak prompt
      • tweakcc to alter the prompting baked into claude code
      • Any other non-CC harness
      • Scripted API calls

      As usual, Anthropic are just opticsmaxxing because they don’t want to get completely buried in a courtroom. And as other people have pointed out upthread already, it’s already a bit of a moot point since the Chinese models are already eating Claude’s lunch and will do the same stuff without complaint.

  • mousefad@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    “It’s so powerful! You’re only allowed to use it how we want you to”.

    Allowed eh? How about go fuck yourself?

  • kippininreal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    So this is how these companies are going to safeguard against IP theft lawsuits! Leave our theft be, or we’ll tell everyone how to get in.

    Also it’s incredibly telling how Anthropic doesn’t add code to stop suicide ideation in teens (what they are their ilk are being sued for) but can somehow very quickly stop reverse engineering. A tool that values the captial holders through & through. Their “democratization of intelligence” schtick is obvious now.

    OpenSource frontier models ASAP! Obviously never gonna happen, but a fool can dream atleast.

    • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Also it’s incredibly telling how Anthropic doesn’t add code to stop suicide ideation in teens (what they are their ilk are being sued for) but can somehow very quickly stop reverse engineering.

      This.

  • Fierro@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    I’m hopeful this is positive, they’ll start loosing a lot more to Chinese models and I can assure you local models will blow up too.