• TwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    Cory Doctorow’s “Reverse Centaurs Guide to Life After AI” has a short section that pertains to this. He talks about how someone like Linus essentially doesn’t have a boss and has untold resources for whatever “AI” “tools” he finds useful.

    He isn’t ever forced to use the wrong tool for the job or use a tool that simply doesn’t do what his boss thinks it does. He doesn’t have to worry about getting fired or his coworkers getting fired because his boss was sold a story about reducing labor costs with this cool new “tool”. He simply uses what’s useful to him with the probably millions of dollars of compute made available to him by the tech giants.

    95% of people don’t have that luxury. They have a boss itching to get rid of them or 10x their workload with the help of the “tool” that Linus is so happily and defiantly praising on behalf of the monopolists.

  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    When the topic is AI, the quality of some of these Lemmy threads drops down to the level of YouTube comments.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    I guess Linus doesn’t care about the environment or any of the other issues surrounding A.I. I’m not anti-AI just for the sake of being anti-AI. I have a huge problem with AI bcz of it’s environmental impacts, intellectual property violations, job impacts, attempts to replace all employees with AI, the general dumbing down of society and worse off the internet is bcz of AI, the surveillance state being built around it. I could go on, but you get the point. I am a staunch, no AI person bcz of all those reasons and a hundred more.

    This isn’t an age thing, or a, I am getting older and Im stubborn thing. AI is literally ruining the planet and everything on it, and this guy thinks we should just accept that.

    I say fuck off with that noise, I don’t have e to accept anything.

    • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Intellectual property is an imperialist tool for exploitation and oppression. I see you are a fanatic zealot defending it. And you think we should just accept that?

      BTW most tokens today are sold in China and mostly and increasingly produced with nuclear or renewable energy. China is also the country with the most, fastest and most sensible regulations on AI. You’re blaming the ills of neoliberal capitalism on AI.

      Therefor you are shielding capitalism from critique, and are preventing any sensible regulation on AI and any changes to the system that actually leads to our downfall. You people clearly have given up belief in democracy or revolution and just accept that this helpless and brainless zealotry is the only thing you can do now. Preach hate against your common man instead of the oppressors that make the decisions about how AI is used. So if you want to talk ethics, sniff your own butt first.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        Is that really all you got from that? AI is stealing people’s art, their video games, music, etc. I’m not talking about large companies. I’m talking about Joe down the street who’s spent the last 4 years making a game, just to have an AI try to rip a slop version of his game 2 days after he released it.

        I don’t give a shit about Microsoft, or any other corporation for that matter, and the fact that you came in here with this aggressive long ass rant reply to me without even so much as asking a clarifying question says more about you than it does me.

    • ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      as a pro-AI, anti-cloud nerd? All of these problems disappear when we address the real problem of Capitalism.

      there are abandoned tech certs for building datacenters that produce 110% of their own electricity. these are distinct from the data mines these useless nerds want to build.

      without capital, the surveillance state dies.

      intellectual property is a capitalist myth invented to hold us back and induce rents, and I’m tired of pretending otherwise.

      oh no, you fired me from a job I’d rather not have to do and I still get to survive because we slew capitalism? ahhh, how will I cope with the blow to my identity?

        • Urist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          27 days ago

          No, no and no. The two first do not support the third. Environmental demand is not independent of the mode of production.

  • flandish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    the thing is - no other tool (currently yall_cant_read) in our industry, and others, out there involves as much active destruction in both the working class and environment in its use.

    that’s it. that’s the bit.

    for those not understanding: the word “in” above implies in current use not that i am comparing AI’s effects with the invention of knitting machines or electricity.

      • Mordikan@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        The invention of the light bulb.

        That has been SO much worse than the negatives we’ve seen with AI. If anyone is interested, that is a horrible story socially, industrially, environmentally, etc. Definitely worth reading about.

  • Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    Yeah, but your compiler wasn’t made with massive copyright infringement, stealing much needed water and rampant corruption, was it?

  • reka@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    Conversations on this subject will continue to stagnate and miss the important points as long as people continue to act like the discussion of ethics is the same as the discussion of efficacy. People who disagree with AI on a principle of its impacts being negative will often call it “a lying machine which is regularly wrong and offers no utility”.

    May I suggest that people with criticisms of the ethics and impact of AI take a charitable position towards the utility offered by AI. Accept something along the lines of a positive account given by an experienced software engineer - it’s useful, it presents risks but also it presents new ways to get certain work done well in much less time etc.

    Even if you do not believe this, the point is it is a much more ambiguous argument than the ethical argument or the concerns over the impact of AI on the species, environment or society. You weaken those arguments by putting them along side poorly justified, somewhat falsifiable claims that AI just doesn’t work.

    • Routhinator@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      This mindset is the entire problem. “Oh we don’t need to worry about ethics or morals, just efficiency” is exactly the issue with every pro-AI argument and every pro-capatalism argument. Its the issue with our governments, with investing, with corporations.

      I say fuck anyone who argues ethics is not important when talking about efficacy. Fuck that mindset and fuck AI.