• FedX@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I guess they read the silmarillion, but understood not the words they read.

    • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      To be fair, can anyone understand The Silmarillion? The way it is written is hard even when you are literate.

    • cavitationfetishist2@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      They all do this. San francisco used to be the old hyperliterate drug fueled counterculture mecca. So they still identify with that, and there’s still like vestigial aesthetic shreds of the old city’s corpse hanging off their beloved Moloch (howl-written in San Francisco). So they see literary allusions and implying they’ve read books as cool. Especially the ones who came up in the 80s and 90s when the old literate hippies could still afford to live there.

      But none of them have read more than one book, because one is enough to reference, right? and they didn’t understand it. So mike zuckerberg read ‘snow crash’ and is just doing all the evil shit from ‘snow crash’. Thiel read LOTR. Whoever keeps giving money to ‘ai children’s toy’ read ‘diamond age’.

      Because they see is=aught and can’t tell the difference between fiction and reality on an emotional level, being shit heads who fundamentally disrespect the very concept of humanities and have no interiority.

  • stenAanden@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Tolkien supported the fascists in the Spanish civil war. He was also a member of the Catholic church so he probably supported the Catholic missions of the Spanish empire, which were basically concentration camps.

    He had his own crazy beliefs. We can’t know how he would react to this.

    FFS we need to stop idolizing media personalities anyone like this.

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Catholic missions of the Spanish empire, which were basically concentration camps.

      If you compare the population of Latin America and North America, doesn’t Latin America look like the natives were less exterminated?

      • stenAanden@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Really depends on what area. There are parts of Mexico where the native population was completely decimated, like the more northern parts, like Nuevo León. Many of the depopulations of native Indians in the southern parts of the modern area of USA also happened when they were part of the Spanish Empire, like the Guale, Timucua and Apalachee of Florida, or the people of New Mexico, and the various people of California.

          • stenAanden@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            No, other Europeans killed indian natives as well. I’d say USA has been the worst of the colonial powers in their treatment of the natives with Spain coming second.