• James R Kirk@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Honestly if someone is literally asking to get put on a list of toxic users I see no reason they shouldn’t be accomodated, it will be doing a favor to those of us who appreciate having the feature.

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      list of toxic users

      Oops! You accepted the premise of someone who shipped a hidden filter list in FOSS. Someone acting dishonestly shouldn’t be taken at face value.

            • Grimy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              The situation would be the same if he also could block you for other users and instances without telling them.

              Personally blocking a user on your account is fine Personally blocking a user from your admin is fine

              Both those things use Lemmy tools and the modlog. Banning people with a secret shadowban malware list and distributing this malware to other instances is unethical.

              I’m fairly certain this user is Admiral Patrick’s alt. He is in every thread not only defending but straight up lying.

              I highly urge everyone to go take a look at the list. There’s lgbt communities and instances, small news orgs and even a word ban so your comment doesn’t show if it has “Epstein class” in it for example.

              The app only showed you half the ban list, it hid the LGBTQ bans, users and comment stuff from what I understand.

              • James R Kirk@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                I don’t consider an optional ui used by optional instances with an optional and clearly labeled feature that enables an optional GUI toggle that allows users to control a filter that does not actually ban anyone to be “malware”

                • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  clearly labeled

                  Clear as mud. You knew adding the entire Blahaj instance on a “toxicity” filter would cause an uproar, that’s why you went out of your way to hide it.