• jpreston2005@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      more money, more bribery, longer campaigns, more ads, whoopeee! Nobody but billionaires and their political lapdogs want this! hoorayy!

    • Macchi_the_Slime@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Kind of. The PAC could spend as much money as it wanted, but it couldn’t give above a certain amount directly to the candidate. Which they took issue with now because the candidate themselves gets a discounted rate for ad buys and the Democrats were getting more and more of their money from small dollar donations.

      So the Republican PACs would spend say 100m and get the same amount of ads a Democratic candidate could buy with like 25m (those almost certainly aren’t the actual numbers, idk the actual discounted rate the candidates actually get. That’s just an example to illustrate the concept)

  • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Won’t let me read the article because it “suspects I’m a robot.”

    jesus fucking christ do I despise you, new york times.