It’s Pi Hole. Everything’s computer.

  • einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    At this point just use the TV as screen for a Raspberry and be done with it. Pi hole is good but it cant catch everything, and i would expect smart tv’s by now try to smuggle out data on things that can get around the pihole. Every Smart TV has to be assumed a compromised device, with advanced data exfiltration options.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      New TVs will connect to other smart TVs that have been connected to the Internet.

      You straight up have to pull their chips now if you really want to be sure.

      • rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is the first I’ve heard of such a thing. Like TVs connecting to one another through Wifi Direct or BTLE and tethering their internet connection? Can you link to anything discussing this?

        • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Hmm, I recall reading a couple articles about it a year or so ago but nothing is coming up in searches.

          I’m not sure if that means it was vaporware, misinformation, or coming soon to a Google TV near you. Anyone that’s more familiar with network capabilities is free to correct me, but as far as I’m aware if your TV even has Bluetooth it’s already capable of doing this at some level.

          Either way you’ll catch a smart appliance in my house when I’m dead.

      • Patches@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        ? If you’re going to block 1 Smart TV from the Internet. Why wouldn’t you do it to all the TVs on your LAN?

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I thought government regulation would prevent that? I thought the whole point of a Mac address was a unique id for hardware

        • Opisek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Unique IDs are a privacy concern. Best you can tell by randomized MAC addresses is who the manufacturer of the device is and the type of device if you’re lucky (like when the manufacturer’s departments are internally split into separate companies), but that’s not guaranteed.

  • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I have a smart TV. It is connected to two things. The wall socket for power and HDMI #2 for my PC.

    Edit: Also I have a PFSense router, I use PFBlockNG to also block the IPs behind the blocked DNS entries. My phone is GrapheneOS and all of my computers are GNU Linux. Any blocked incidents I get are usually from websites. If I surf the web a lot in a month, I maybe get 200 blocked incidents. If my normie friends stay over with, for example, a Windows PC and an iPhone, I get 2000 per day. It’s wild what’s going on with these devices.

      • passepartout@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Probably because you should care about the fuckton of TVs being sold and in circulation with software that is just some of the worst privacy violations bundled together in a case behind a big LCD/OLED panel. There is no option to avoid it and probably no option to install something else on the hardware you bought and therefor should be yours to do whatever you want to with it. I even read that some connect to open wifi access points without passwords to reach the internet.

        • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Probably because you should care about the fuckton of TVs being sold and in circulation with software that is just some of the worst privacy violations bundled together in a case behind a big LCD/OLED panel.

          But that’s what I mean. I don’t use my TV as a smart TV, it’s plugged into a device where I can control the privacy settings via HDMI. No wifi, no apps being used, no connection to the outside world. That’s why I don’t care about DNS shenanigans with the TV, because I do them more comfortably on another device.

          • passepartout@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You not caring about the implications because you can avoid it in your own home could have come across as not helpful to the greater cause I guess.

      • Novaling@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We do a lot of streaming in my house unfortunately, mostly using Kodi to pirate anime. So it needs Wifi in our case. If I had some old (working) laptops and router around, I’d do a Pihole and VPN but alas.

  • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I never plan on replacing my commercial display. when it breaks, i won’t care. don’t watch tv or movies anyways. it’s all garbage