OS for selfhoster. Here’s a video by Dev.

      • DaseinPickle@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        From Reddit:

        “I bought an Umbrel.com home server hoping to have a dedicated device to run my favorite software on. I spent $500 and got an Umbrel.

        Their “app store” is small, outdated (from an app update perspective), and filled with cryptocurrency junk. I should also mention that its difficult to use non-approved software, requiring your own GitHub repo with config files, docker setup, and a few other things. No one-click button to import software.

        The hardware is half as good as a used 1L mini-PC that you can get on Amazon for $170, and itll give you more control.

        The Umbrel has an HDMI port hidden inside, so if you want to use it you must cut a hole in the side for it. The only way to accees its interface is with a slow, buggy, and heavy web UI.

        Don’t buy an Umbrel, buy a $100 used 1L machine and save yourself a headache and $400.

        EDIT: I asked for a refund and was denied since they don’t offer them to anyone. Huge red flag!”

  • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    The fact that its so heavily geared toward crypto makes me uneasy. Otherwise it seems like an awesome idea.

  • cron@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    3 years ago

    umbrelOS is licensed under the PolyForm Noncommercial 1.0.0 license.

    I’ve never heard of this one.

    • astraeus@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      Source-avaliable, but not FOSS. You can’t take anything with the PolyForm license and use it for commercial purposes. Seems like using umbrelOS to set up companies with self-hosted applications might technically be against the terms of the license. Or even using the self-hosted applications for your own personal use and making money from any of them in some way may also be against the terms.

      • rentar42@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 years ago

        A custom “source available” license that may not be as clear-cut as intended and depends on “we know it when we see it” by the authors of the license? You don’t say!

  • astraeus@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 years ago

    Seems like the consensus on this one is it isn’t worth it and until they fix their licensing it’s more risky to use as anything other than a day project. In fact, the licensing is kind of dubious for project work because of its weird stipulations.

    • sag@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      Didn’t tried yet. Waiting for Debian version but look very promising and begginer friendly.